Let $\alpha \in [0,3], \beta \geq 1, \lambda \geq 1$ and fix $n \in \mathbb{N}$. Consider the function $f(x;\alpha, \beta, \lambda) = x^{\alpha}\exp(-\lambda x^\beta)$. Let $I(n; \alpha,\beta,\lambda) = \int_0^\infty 1 - (1 - f(x;\alpha, \beta, \lambda))^n dx$.
I want to know how does function $I(n;\alpha, \beta, \lambda)$ scale with $n$ and the parameters $\alpha, \beta, \lambda$. I know that for $\alpha = 0, \beta = 1$ and $\lambda > 0$, we have that $I(n;\alpha = 0, \beta = 1, \lambda) \sim \log n / \lambda$. This is because we have that \begin{align} I(n;\alpha = 0, \beta = 1, \lambda) &= \int_{0}^\infty (1 - (1 - \exp(-\lambda x))^n) dx \\ &= (1 / \lambda) \int_{0}^1 (1 - (1 - t)^n )/ t dt \\ &= (1 /\lambda) \sum_{k = 1}^n {n \choose k} (-1)^{k + 1} / k \\ &= (1 / \lambda) \sum_{k = 1}^n 1 / k \\ &\sim \log n / \lambda \end{align} where the last equality follows from an identity for the harmonic series I found here.
Intuitively, I conjecture that the more general case is \begin{align} I(n;\alpha, \beta = 1, \lambda) \sim (\log n / \lambda) + o((\log n)) \end{align}
However, due to the extra $x^\alpha$ in $f(x; \alpha, \beta, \lambda)$, it is unclear to me if there is a clean and simple proof for this or whether the conjecture is true in the first place?
Moreover, can one show a more general result for $\beta \geq 1$, where \begin{align} I(n;\alpha, \beta, \lambda) \sim C(\alpha, \beta, \lambda) (\log n)^{1 / \beta} - o((\log n)^{1/\beta}) \end{align}
Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.