5
$\begingroup$

Let $x$ and $y$ be given real numbers. We may suppose that $2\leqslant x \leqslant y$ and that $u:= \log(y)/\log(x)$ remains bounded in a compact set away from $1$ as $x,y\to\infty$. An integer $n$ is said to be $x$-rough if all its prime factors are at least $x$. Let us denote the set of all $x$ rough numbers as $R_x$.

I am interested in obtaining asymptotic formula for the sum $$ \sum_{n\leqslant y,\ n\in R_x} \frac{1}{n}. $$

In fact, for my purpose, an upper bound of the correct order of magnitude should suffice. A naive upper bound maybe obtained as follows; From Buchstab's theorem (see Chapter 7 of Montgomery-Vaughan) states that there are $\sim w(u)y/\log(x)$ integers $n\leqslant y$ such that $n\in R_x$. Here $w(u)$ is a weight function depending only on $u$. Therefore

$$ \sum_{n\leqslant y,\ n\in R_x} \frac{1}{n}\leqslant 1+ \sum_{n=x}^{x + w(u) y/\log(x)} \frac{1}{n} \ll (u-1)\log(x) - \log\log(x) + \mathcal{O}_u(1). $$

I am inclined to believe that this is not the correct order of magnitude. For example if $u\leqslant 2$, then the sum is over primes and the growth is $\sim \log\log(x)$.

The analogous question regarding smooth numbers seems to have received a lot of attention (see this question and the references therein).

Any help in this regard is greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please use a high-level tag like "nt.number-theory". I added this tag now. Regarding high-level tags, see meta.mathoverflow.net/q/1075 $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Sep 3 at 12:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems the sum you want is bounded above by $\prod_{x < p \le y} (1+1/p+1/p^2+\dots) = \prod_{x < p \le y} (1-1/p)^{-1} \ll \log{y}/\log{x}$, by Mertens' theorem. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 3 at 15:11

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

(I am going to switch your $x$ and $y$ for aesthetic purposes.)

The correct upper bound is $\log x/\log y$, which in particular is bounded if $y$ is a power of $x$.

Let $\Phi(x,y)$ be the number of $y$-rough integers up to $x$. By integration by parts, your sum is $$\sum_{\substack{n \le x \\ n \text{ is }y\text{-rough}}}\frac{1}{n} = \int_{1^-}^{x} \frac{d\Phi(t,y)}{t} = \frac{\Phi(x,y)}{x}+\int_{1}^{x} \frac{\Phi(t,y)}{t^2}dt .$$

We have the classical bound $\Phi(t,y) \ll \frac{t}{\log y}$ if $y \le t$, and otherwise $\Phi(t,y)=1$. It follows that, for $y \le x$, $$\sum_{\substack{n \le x \\ n \text{ is }y\text{-rough}}}\frac{1}{n} \ll \frac{1}{\log y}+\frac{1}{\log y}\int_{y}^{x} \frac{dt}{t} + \int_{1}^{y} \frac{dt}{t^2} \ll \frac{\log(x/y)+1}{\log y} \ll u $$ where $u:=\log x/\log y$ as usual.

A lower bound of $\gg u$ can be exhibited as well. Indeed, just use $\Phi(t,y)\gg \frac{t}{\log y}$ for $y \le \sqrt{t}$ in the argument above to obtain that your sum is $\gg \frac{\log(x/y^2)}{\log y} =u-2 \gg u$ if $u \ge 3$. If $u<3$ one has the trivial lower bound $1$ (since $1$ is $y$-rough) which is $\gg u$.

Some comments:

  • For $x\ge y >\sqrt{x}$, your sum is just a sum over primes and the number $1$ (which is $y$-rough for every $y$), as you observed, in which case Mertens' Theorem implies that your sum is $1+\sum_{y\le p \le x} \frac{1}{p} = 1+\log \log x - \log \log y + o(1) = 1+ \log u +o(1)$, which is bounded. For $y>x$, your sum is identically $1$.
  • For $y=x^{o(1)}$ I believe the asymptotics can be shown to be $\prod_{p<y}(1-\tfrac{1}{p}) \log x$ (in the above proof use $\Phi(t,y)\sim t\prod_{p<y}(1-\tfrac{1}{p})$ for $y=t^{o(1)}$, which is a consequence of the fundamental lemma of sieve theory, say). If this $y$ also satisfies $y\to \infty$ then this is $\sim e^{-\gamma} u$ by Mertens' Theorem.
  • For bounded $u=\log x/\log y \ge 2$, one should be able to show that the asymptotics is of the shape $u f(u)$ where $f$ satisfies a delay differential equation and $\lim_{u\to \infty} f(u)=e^{-\gamma}$. This can be proved by using the precise asymptotics for $\Phi(x,y)$ in terms of the Buchstab function.
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .