I've begun to study concentration of measure because of its relevance to statistical mechanics. In recent decades concentration inequalities have played a role in elucidating foundational conceptual issues such as the degree to which equilibrium states are typical in the state space of physical systems (see e.g. this paper).
As far as I can tell as someone only newly introduced to concentration of measure, a lot is known about concentration for certain classes of sufficiently nice functions $f:S^{N-1}\to\mathbb R$ (Levy's Lemma for example). A lot also seems to be known about sequences $X_1, \dots, X_N$ of i.i.d. random variables (the DKW inequality for example). But I'm interested in results that don't seem to follow, at least in a way that's sufficiently straightforward to me, from standard concentration inequalities, and I'm having trouble finding what's known about such statements. Here's an example that I had originally thought would be simple to find in the literature:
Let $X = (X_1, \dots, X_N)$ be a uniform random vector on $S^{N-1}$. The $X_i$ are not independent, but I have a sense that they should be approximately independent for large $N$, so I suspect that something like the DKW inequality should hold in this case. Perhaps something like this: Let $F_N$ be the corresponding empirical CDF; \begin{align} F_N(x) = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N \mathbf 1_{\{X_i \leq x\}} \end{align} and let $F$ be the marginal CDF of each $X_i$ (which I think is asymptotically gaussian), then for ever $\epsilon > 0$, \begin{align} \mathbf P\left(\sup_{x\in \mathbf R}\left|F_N(x) - F(x)\right| > \epsilon\right) \leq \text{something that's small for large $N$} \end{align} Is there such a result? If so, does it follow from well-known concentration theory?