4
$\begingroup$

Is there a polynomial vector field $$P(x,y,z)\partial_x+Q(x,y,z)\partial_y+R(x,y,z)\partial_z$$ which has a closed orbit $K$ such that $K$ is a non trivial knot?

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ my first candidate would be a torus knot. I am not sure right now, whether the description of a torus knot given in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus_knot translates to polynominial functions $P,Q,R$ as requested. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ @HenrikRüping Thank you for this comment. But I think that a homemorphic copy of a torus knot has a simple parametrization whose tangent field is a linear vector field on $\mathbb{R}^4$. But my question is about algebraic vector field in $\mathbb{R}^3$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ A motivation for this question is the following mathoverflow.net/questions/477495/… $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 12:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe one should ask whether every knot occurs in this way. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 28 at 9:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @YCor My answer shows they do. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Aug 30 at 7:09

3 Answers 3

6
$\begingroup$

For the Lorenz equations (which are polynomial), this was studied at least as far back as a 1983 paper in "Topology" by Birman and Williams -- MR0682059 if you have MathSciNet. The title is "Knotted periodic orbits in dynamical systems"; they prove, among other things, that the Lorenz flow has knots with arbitrarily high genus, and contains all torus knots.

There is also a 1997 volume of Lecture Notes in Mathematics entitled "Knots and Links in Three-Dimensional Flows", by R. Ghrist, P. Holmes, and M. Sullivan.

Both of these are referred to in the written version of the 2006 ICM address by Étienne Ghys, entitled "Knots and Dynamics", which is MR2334193 on MathSciNet if you have access, and is also posted on his website. There was a question on MSE some time back about a link to the video of his ICM talk, which may be of interest, and there is a nice website with many pictures by Ghys and Jos Leys that describes some of these ideas.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much Vaughn for your very interesting answer $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28 at 7:51
6
$\begingroup$

Here is an answer with many details to fill in. It will get you any knot.

Consider the closed solid torus $\mathbb D^2\times\mathbb S^1\subset\mathbb C^2$, and define on it the vector field $X:(x,u)\mapsto(-x,iu)$ (it goes along the torus, and is pushed to the center).

For any choice of (smooth) knot in any 3-dimensional manifold $M$, you can send the above torus to a neighborhood of it so that it winds in the same way. This induces a vector field on some neighborhood of your knot.

I claim that any field on $M$ whose restriction is close enough to the induced field will admit a closed orbit that flows once along the torus, hence is homotopic to the initial knot within the neighborhood. Indeed, provided the new vector field is still

  • transverse to the discs $\mathbb D^2\times\{\theta\}$ and
  • transverse to the boundary $\mathbb S^1\times\mathbb S^1$,

then there exists a well-defined Poincaré return map $f:\mathbb D^1\to\mathbb D^2$, it is continuous, and it sends the disc to a smaller disc. This means that, say by Brouwer's theorem, that $f$ has a fixed point, whose orbit must flow once along the torus by definition of the return map.

Now for your case, take any knot in $\mathbb R^3$, send the torus as described, and approximate the vector field to a high precision in this compact set by Stone–Weierstrass.

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. the concept of torus knot remind me of the following questionwhich arose me one week ago: Can we perturbe a torus knot such that the perturbed knot would be included in a (nearby) leaf of the Reeb foliation? My apology for asking this extra question here $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure what you are asking. (1) There are tori and knots in my answer, but no torus knots. (2) As far as I understand, the leaves of the Reeb foliation are topologically planes (except of course for the initial torus), so any injective image of a circle with values in a fixed leaf must be homotopic, within the leaf, to arbitrarily small circles; it can never be a (non-trivial) knot. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Aug 27 at 13:26
  • $\begingroup$ Yes You are right. You did not consider torus knot and I did not say that "The concept of torus knot in your answer'. But the nearby leaves are not embedded plane they are somewhat spiraling around the torus $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 13:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ They are still injectively immersed planes, and that's enough. The spiraling does not matter. From an injective immersion $\mathbb R^2\to\mathbb R^3$, you get a "knot" in $\mathbb R^2$ in the preimage, so you can contract it to a very small circle in $\mathbb R^2$. The image of the homotopy is a homotopy of the image, hence an isotopy, and the final result is a tiny circle in $\mathbb R^3$ that is just barely deformed, and it is a topological unknot. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Aug 27 at 13:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand the details of your questions, but let me try to answer anyway. The initial torus is abstract, but its image in $\mathbb R^3$ is knotted; its "center", i.e. the image of $\{0\}\times\mathbb S^1$, is knotted in the same way. Now for the new, polynomial vector field, the center is not an orbit anymore. However, my argument is that there still exists a closed orbit of that winds along the torus. This means that in the abstract torus, the orbit is homotopic to the central curve, but in $\mathbb R^3$ it is knotted the same way the torus is. $\endgroup$
    – Pierre PC
    Commented Aug 28 at 14:34
5
$\begingroup$

Over at math.SE, I give two polynomials $F(x,y,z)$, $G(x,y,z)$, whose common zero locus is the trefoil knot, and which are smooth and transverse there. Therefore, $(\nabla F) \times (\nabla G)$ is a vector field tangent to the knot.


I think you should be able to get a shorter answer as follows. Take the sphere $S$ given by $x_1^2+y_1^2+x_2^2+y_2^2=1$ in $\mathbb{R}^4$. The vector field $$p(-y_1 \frac{\partial}{\partial x_1}+x_1 \frac{\partial}{\partial y_1})+q(-y_2 \frac{\partial}{\partial x_2}+x_2 \frac{\partial}{\partial y_2})$$ is tangent to $S$, and its flow lines are of the form $$(x_1, y_1, x_2, y_2) = (r_1 \cos(p t), r_1 \sin(p t), r_2 \cos(q t), r_2 \sin(q t))$$ which is a $(p,q)$ torus knot in $S$.

To give an even more extreme example, if we use $$(x_1^2+y_1^2)(-y_1 \frac{\partial}{\partial x_1}+x_1 \frac{\partial}{\partial y_1})+(x_2^2+y_2^2)(-y_2 \frac{\partial}{\partial x_2}+x_2 \frac{\partial}{\partial y_2})$$ then we should be able to get all the torus knots to occur in the same vector field: We'll have $T(p_1, p_2)$ on the torus $x_1^2+y_1^2 = \tfrac{p_1}{p_1+p_2}$, $x_2^2+y_2^2 = \tfrac{p_2}{p_1+p_2}$.

Now make a stereographic change of coordinates to get a vector field on $\mathbb{R}^3$ rather than $S^2$. That will give you a vector field with rational functions as coefficients, and clearing out the denominators will just change the speed of the flow.

But I don't feel up to doing that computation right now, so I'll leave the details to you.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you very much and +1 for your perfect answer which perhaps? (I think) is a negative answer to the linked question. So the Torus knot idea of @HenrikRuping was a very good idea $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 12:30
  • $\begingroup$ The 4 dim. vector field is just the vector field we discussed with Henrik in the comments. I did not pay attention that not only torus but also 3 sphere is invariant under the linear vector field. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 12:36
  • $\begingroup$ Since you talked about the p-q ( torus) knot this remind me of the following questionwhich arose me one week ago: Can we perturbe a torus knot such that the perturbed knot would be included in a (nearby) leaf of the Reeb foliation? My apology for asking this extra question here $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27 at 13:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .