6
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathfrak g$ be a Lie algebra which is not reductive. Let $T(\mathfrak g)$ and $U(\mathfrak g)$ be the tensor algebra and universal enveloping algebra of $\mathfrak g$ respectively. We have a cannonical surjection $p: T(\mathfrak g) \rightarrow U(\mathfrak g)$. Does it give a surjective map from $T(\mathfrak g)^{\mathfrak g}$ to $U(\mathfrak g)^{\mathfrak g}$ ? Here $T(\mathfrak g)^{\mathfrak g}$ (resp. $U(\mathfrak g)^{\mathfrak g}$) are the $\mathfrak g$-invariants of $T(\mathfrak g)$ (resp. $U(\mathfrak g)$).

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

10
$\begingroup$

The projection from the tensor algebra to the symmetric algebra is a split surjection. Therefore so is the map from $T(\mathfrak g)$ to $U(\mathfrak g)$, by the PBW theorem. Now note that PBW is an isomorphism of $\mathfrak g$-modules, and that split surjections are preserved by any functor.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Why is PBW a morphism of $\mathfrak g$-modules? $\endgroup$
    – Nandor
    Commented Aug 12 at 6:46
  • $\begingroup$ One reference for this is Loday, Cyclic homology, §3.3.4. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 7:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Are you assuming characteristic zero? $\endgroup$
    – Nandor
    Commented Aug 12 at 7:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Loday's §3.3.4 assumes char. zero. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 12 at 7:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I'm assuming characteristic zero. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12 at 7:36
10
$\begingroup$

To round things up, let's give a counterexample in positive characteristic.

Let $F=\mathbb{F}_2$ the field of two elements and let $L=F X\oplus FY$ be the Lie algebra with $[X,Y]=X$. We write $\pi$ for the map $T(L)\to U(L)$.

Any $f\in T(L)^L$ can uniquely be written as $f=Xa+Yb+\theta$ with $a,b\in T(L)_k$ and $\theta\in F$. We have $$ 0=\mathrm{ad}_X(f)=X\mathrm{ad}_X(a)+Xb+Y\mathrm{ad}_X(b). $$ Note that, as $F$ has characteristic 2 one has $\mathrm{ad}_X(a)=Xa+aX$ for every $a\in T(L)$. Since $T(L)=XT(L)\oplus YT(L)\oplus F$, it follows $\mathrm{ad}_X(b)=0$, so $0=X\mathrm{ad}_X(a)+Xb$ and therefore $b=\mathrm{ad}_X(a)$, i.e., $$ f=Xa+X\mathrm{ad}_X(a)=Xa+XXa+XaX. $$ By PBW and char($F$)=2 it follows $$ \pi(f)=Xa+\ \mathrm{lower\ order\ terms}. $$ The element $D=Y^2+Y\in U(L)$ satisfies $$ \mathrm{ad}_X(D)=[X,Y]Y+Y[X,Y]+[X,Y]=XY+YX+X=[X,Y]+X=X+X=0. $$ Therefore $D\in U(L)^L$ but it is not of the form $\pi(f)$ for any $f\in T(L)^L$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.