6
$\begingroup$

It is a theorem that a finite nontrivial group $G$ has no proper nontrivial characteristic subgroups if and only if $G \cong S^n$ where $S$ is simple and $n > 0$ is the number of copies of $S$ in a direct product. Call an automorphism $\varphi \in \operatorname{Aut}(G)$ irreducible if $\varphi(H) \not\subseteq H$ for all proper nontrivial normal $H \subseteq G$. (I am just coining this term, please let me know if there is an actual name for this.) When $S$ is abelian, irreducible automorphisms are precisely irreps of the group $\mathbb{Z}$ over the vector space $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ and are precisely characterized by irreducible polynomials in the ring $\mathbb{F}_p[t]$ of degree $n$, excluding the polynomial $t$ because it corresponds to the $0$ map. What is the situation like when $S$ is non-abelian?

Edit: bolded text added.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ So I'm sure this is classical but if $S$ is nonabelian it looks to me like the automorphism group is the wreath product $\text{Aut}(S) \wr S_n$; basically the point is that the obvious copies of $S$ are uniquely determined by some property (e.g. I think they are the only copies of $S$ which are normal, or which are direct summands) so an automorphism has to permute them. Then a necessary condition for irreducibility is that the corresponding permutation of the copies of $S$ is a cycle. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 6 at 22:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Conversely if the permutation is a cycle then I think $\varphi$ is "indecomposable" in the sense that it doesn't preserve a nontrivial direct summand. This is equivalent to your condition in the abelian case. In the nonabelian case I don't know that irreducibility is a good condition; e.g. if $n = 1$ and $S$ has trivial outer automorphism group then every automorphism of $G$ is inner and so preserves some cyclic subgroup. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 6 at 23:00
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, that made me realize an error I made. I should have said that they don't fix normal subgroups. $\endgroup$
    – Keith
    Commented Aug 6 at 23:11

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

Suppose $S$ is non-abelian simple. Using https://groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Normal_subdirect_product_of_perfect_groups_equals_direct_product we know the normal subgroups of $S^n$ are of the form $S^I$ for some subset $I\subset\{1,\dots,n\}$ of indices. So $\varphi$ being irreducible is equivalent to $\varphi(S^I)\not\subset S^I$.

Next, note the following fact that Qiaochu mentions in the comments:

Lemma The automorphism group of $S^n$ is $\mathrm{Aut}(S)\wr \Sigma_n$.

Proof Let $\varphi\colon S^n\to S^n$ be an automorphism. For each $i\in\{1,\dots,n\}$, the $i$-th summand $S_i\subset S^n$ is a normal subgroup, hence $\varphi(S_i)\subset S^n$ is a normal subgroup. But by the above characterization of normal subgroups of $S^n$ we know $\varphi(S_i)=S_{\sigma(i)}$ for some index $\sigma(i)\in\{1,\dots,n\}$. Thus $\varphi=\psi\circ \sigma$ where $\sigma$ permutes the factors and $\psi$ is an automorphism of $S^n$ sending $S_i$ to $S_i$. But then $\psi=\psi_1\times\cdots\times\psi_n$ where $\psi_i\in\mathrm{Aut}(S)$.


Now, let $\varphi\in\mathrm{Aut}(S^n)$ be an automorphism which induces a permutation $\sigma\in \Sigma_n$ on the direct factors. Then the condition that $\varphi(S^I)\not\subset S^I$ is equivalent to $\sigma(I)\not\subset I$ for any non-trivial subset $I$ of $\{1,\dots,n\}$. This is equivalent to $\sigma$ being a $n$-cycle. Thus, we conclude:

Proposition An automorphism $\varphi$ of $S^n$ is irreducible if and only if the permutation $\sigma\in\Sigma_n$ induced on the direct factors is a $n$-cycle.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.