Kalman - Six ways to sum a series discusses Euler's original proof for the Basel problem $\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{6} $:
$$\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x} = 1- \frac{x}{3!}+ \frac{x^2}{5!}- \frac{x^3}{7!}+\dotsb.$$ The roots of $\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x}$ are the numbers $\pi^2, 4\pi^2, 9\pi^2, 16\pi^2, \dots$. Now Euler knew that adding up the reciprocals of all the roots of a polynomial results in the negative of the ratio of the linear coefficient to the constant coefficient. In symbols, if $$(x − r_1)(x − r_2)\dotsm(x − r_n) = x^{n} + a_{n−1}x^{n−1} + \dots + a_1x + a_0$$ then $$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{r_k}= \frac{-a_1}{a_0}.$$ Assuming that the same law must hold for a power series expansion, he applied it to $\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x}$ , concluding that $$\frac{1}{6}=\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(\pi n)^2}.$$ Why is this not considered a valid proof today? The problem is that power series are not polynomials, and do not share all the properties of polynomials. $$\frac{1}{1 − x}=1+ x + x^2 + x^3 + \dotsb$$ holds for all $x$ of absolute value less than $1$. Now consider the function $g(x)=2 − \frac 1 {1 − x}$. Clearly, $g$ has a single root, $\frac 1 2$. The power series expansion for $g(x)$ is $ 1−x−x^2−x^3−\dotsb$, so $a_0 = 1$ and $a_1 = −1$. The sum of the reciprocal roots does not equal the ratio $−\frac{a_1}{a_0}$. While this example shows that the reciprocal root sum law cannot be applied blindly to all power series, it does not imply that the law never holds. Indeed, the law must hold for the function $\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x}$ because we have independent proofs of Euler’s result. Notice the differences between $\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x}$ and the $g$ of the counterexample. The function $\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x}$ has an infinite number of roots, where $g$ has but one. And $\frac{\sin(\sqrt x)}{\sqrt x}$ has a power series that converges for all $x$, where the series for $g$ only converges for $−1 <x< 1$.
Is there a theorem which provides conditions under which a power series satisfies the reciprocal root sum law? I don’t know.
Is there a known theorem that specifies conditions under which a power series representation satisfies the reciprocal root sum law? My search hasn't yielded any such theorem. Does such a theorem exist, and if so, what are the conditions it outlines?