1
$\begingroup$

We recently published an article on Busemann-Petty type problems (see https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05630). As we experienced several times that as soon as an article is published, no updates/corrections/... are given any more leading to follow-up mistakes, we would like to open here a central spot to collect all errata/public comments/discussion on our article.

In particular, we would welcome

  • any report on errors (including typos in relevant formulas and constants) in our article
  • comments and discussion on the results of the article (including references to follow-up articles which extend/improve our results).

This is the first time we try this and our main motivation is to increase quality and transparency. If you have any suggestions for a better way to do this, please let us know.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ this is not really suitable for MO, which is a site for a specific question, which can then receive a definitive answer; a platform that allows for comments of arXiv papers is scirate.com (although at present it mainly has topics in quantum information) $\endgroup$
    – Carlo Beenakker
    Commented Apr 23 at 8:49

0

Reset to default

Browse other questions tagged .