3
$\begingroup$

Is the following formula already known?

$$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{2^k k!}{(2k + 1)!} = \sqrt{\frac{e\pi}{2}} \operatorname{erf}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)$$

The right-hand side is known since Ramanujan, but the left-hand side has not been reported in the literature. So I wonder if this connection between these two expressions is already known.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 16
    $\begingroup$ "The right member is known since Ramanujan but the left member has not been reported in the literature." -- What do you mean by this? In particular, what do you mean by "The right member is known since Ramanujan"? How can a "member" be known or unknown? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 11:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MartinNicholson : Thank you for the references. In some cases, it seems much easier to prove a thing than to find it in the literature. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 17:05
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ This was answered in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3063482 and its related linked questions. $\endgroup$
    – Somos
    Commented Apr 9 at 19:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CrawCraw : Do you have a response to the answers below? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11 at 2:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It looks like the only actual answer to this question with a pointer to the literature for this identity was in a now-deleted comment of Martin Nicholson. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11 at 13:54

2 Answers 2

21
$\begingroup$

Let $$f(x):=\sqrt{\pi } e^{x^2/4} \operatorname{erf}(x/2).$$ Then $$f'(x)=\tfrac12\, x f(x)+1.$$ So, by the Leibniz formula, for $m\ge1$, $$f^{(m+1)}(x)=\tfrac12\,x f^{(m)}(x)+\tfrac m2\,f^{(m-1)}(x)$$ and hence $$f^{(m+1)}(0)=\tfrac m2\,f^{(m-1)}(0).$$ Also, $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=1$. So, for all $k\ge0$ we have $f^{(2k)}(0)=0$ and $f^{(2k+1)}(0)=k!$. So, $$\sqrt{\pi } e^{x^2/4} \operatorname{erf}(x/2)=f(x) =\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{k!}{(2k+1)!}\,x^{2k+1}. \tag{10}\label{10}$$ Your identity is a special case of \eqref{10} with $x=\sqrt2$.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Is it clear that $f(x)$ must equal its Taylor series? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 1:14
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @SamHopkins : Yes, because $f$ is an entire function. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 1:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you write \text{erf} instead of \operatorname{erf} then people following your example may type something like $2\text{erf}(x)$ instead of $2\operatorname{erf}(x),$ which looks conspicuously different. Clearly the latter is standard. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 16:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This answer is off topic. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 17:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JannikPitt : The post seems to actually contain two questions: the one in the title and the other one being "So I wonder if this connection between these two members already exists." This answer shows that "this connection [...] exists." $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 17:13
12
$\begingroup$

WolframAlpha returns this result promptly, so it is probably known or straightforward to show. See here.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ This can be a comment $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10 at 12:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.