2
$\begingroup$

Question:

is it always possible to embed a complete, symmetric and metric graph $G$ with $n+1$ vertices isometrically in $\mathbb{R}^n$?

I'm convinced it must be true, but can't remember having seen a proof of it.

Addendum:
The following is a simple counterexample for $n=3$:
take as the vertices the corners of a planar strictly convex quadrilateral and as edgelengths the euclidean distance between the points they connect.
If the weight of an edge that corresponds to a diagonal is increased the resulting $K_4$ can't be embedded isometrically in $\mathbb{R}^3$, the reason being that the other diagonal "acts" as a hinge joint and rotating the adjacent triangles around it, out of the planar position, inevitably brings their opposite corners closer together.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ What exactly is a complete, symmetric and metric graph? $\endgroup$
    – M. Winter
    Commented Nov 28, 2023 at 12:05
  • $\begingroup$ @M.Winter a metriic graph is one in which for the edges of every triangle the triangle inequality holds for the edge-length. In a complete graph there is a connecting edge for every pair of distinct vertices a graph is symmetric if the length of an edge doesn't depend on the order of its adjacent edges $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2023 at 12:10
  • $\begingroup$ See mathoverflow.net/questions/12394 for many references regarding this question $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2023 at 13:40

2 Answers 2

8
$\begingroup$

With the $\ell_\infty$-norm this is true. For example, it is a classic theorem of Fréchet that every $n$-point metric space embeds in $\ell_\infty^{n-1}$. The required embedding $f$ is easy to define. Label the $n$ points as $x_0, x_1, \dots, x_{n-1}$ and let $d(i,j)$ denote the distance between $x_i$ and $x_j$. Let $f(x_0)$ be the zero vector in $\mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ and for all $i,j \in [n-1]$, let $f(x_i)_j=d(i,j)-d(0,j)$. It is easy to check that $\|f(x_i) - f(x_j)\|_\infty=d(i,j)$ for all $i,j \in \{0, \dots, n-1\}$.

However, for other $\ell_p$-norms this is false. Ball proved that for all $n \geq 3$, there are $n$-point $\ell_1$-spaces that require dimension at least $\binom{n-2}{2}$ to embed in $\ell_1$. Ball also proved that for all $1 < p < 2$ and $n \geq 3$, there are $n$-point $\ell_p$-spaces that require dimension at least $\binom{n-1}{2}$ to embed in $\ell_p$. Of course, it is also well-known that there are $n$-point metric spaces that are not embeddable in $\ell_2$ (no matter what the dimension). For the references (and other related results), see the introduction of my paper The excluded minors for isometric realizability in the plane with Samuel Fiorini, Gwenaël Joret, and Antonios Varvitsiotis.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ is the chain $1<p<2$ actually $1\le p\le2$ ? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2023 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ I think it is correct as is. For example every $n$-point $\ell_2$-metric can be embedded in $\ell_2$ with dimension $O(n)$. $\endgroup$
    – Tony Huynh
    Commented Nov 29, 2023 at 9:51
1
$\begingroup$

For an isometric embedding the distances in the graph must satisfy at least the triangle inequality. Let me assume that this is implicit in your notion of "metric graph". But then with more than three vertices, the distances in the graph must also have a non-negative Cayley-Menger determinant, which is stronger than satisfying a triangle inequality for each 3-cycle. So there are 4-vertex graphs that do not embed isometrically in any Euclidean space. And this is the only obstruction: as soon as your $K_{n+1}$ has a non-negative Cayley-Menger determinant, it embeds isometrically into $\Bbb R^n$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a reference for the statement that a positive Cayley-Menger determinant is sufficient for the existence of an isometric embedding? From the volume formula for simplices if follows that the sign of determiant depends on the parity of the space; positive for odd dimensions and negative for even dimensions. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2023 at 15:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Schoenberg, "Remarks to Maurice Fréchet's article 'Sur la définition axiomatique d'une classe d'espace distanciés vectoriellement applicable sur l'espace de Hilbert' ", Annals of Mathematics 36 (1935), 724--732. Available online at ccrma.stanford.edu/~dattorro/Schoenberg2.pdf . See mathoverflow.net/questions/12394 for more. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2023 at 15:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .