Using the definitions from Peter May's A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, a topological space $X$ is weak Hausdorff if for every compact Hausdorff space $K$ and continuous function $f:K\to X$, $f(K)$ is closed in $X$. A subset $A$ of $X$ is said to be compactly closed if for any compact Hausdorff space $K$ and continuous map $f:K\to X$, $f^{-1}(A)$ is closed in $K$. Finally, $X$ is said to be a $k$-space if every compactly closed subset is closed.
In the lemma at the top of page 40, May gives a characterization of weak Hausdorff spaces which can be paraphrased as such:
A $k$-space $X$ is weak Hausdorff if and only if the diagonal $\Delta_X$ is compactly closed in $X\times X$ under the product topology.
I was searching for a counterexample to this lemma when the $k$-space assumption is omitted. I came up with a proof of this lemma, and the forward direction didn't require the $k$-space assumption. So in other words, I am asking
What is an example of a topological space $X$ such that $\Delta_X$ is compactly closed in $X\times X$, but $X$ is not weak Hausdorff?
By the lemma, such an example must not be a $k$-space.