6
$\begingroup$

Why it is true that, over an algebraically closed field, any abelian variety is isogenous to a principally polarized abelian variety?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Here is "why" proof at end of Mumford's book works only over sep. closed $k$ (better than alg. closed). Over any field $k$ always exists polarization $\phi$; seek to "modify" it to be principal. The finite $k$-gp scheme $G = \ker \phi$ contains a $k$-simple $G_0$, and wish to induct on order of $G$ using list of $k$-simple $G_0$. Over any $k$, list is: simple etale $E$ (irred. finite Galois modules), and for ${\rm{char}}(k) = p > 0$ also $\alpha_p$ and dual $E'$ of simple etale $E$ of $p$-power order. For sep. closed $k$, can say $E = \mathbf{Z}/(\ell)$ for prime $\ell$. That's "why". $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    Commented Nov 1, 2010 at 15:12
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ [Above assumed $G \ne 1$; i.e., $\phi$ not principal.] "Hard" step in justifying list of $k$-simple $G_0$ over general $k$ is local-local case when char$(k) = p > 0$. Enough to show local-local $G_0$ of $p$-power order with vanishing Frob. and Ver. are precisely $\alpha_p^N$. Pf #1: $F = 0$ makes $G_0$ "equivalent" to its commutative $p$-Lie algebra, on which $p$-operator is linearization of ${\rm{Lie}}(V_G)$. Pf #2: Dieudonne theory gives result over perfect closure, so want $\alpha_p^N$ over $k$ has no nontriv. "fppf forms". Aut functor is ${\rm{GL}}_N$, so use (non-comm.) fppf Hilbert 90. $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    Commented Nov 1, 2010 at 15:31

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

This is to fill some prerequisites to BCnrd's comment-answer.

First of all, there are several definitions of a polarization on an abelian variety, and the most "coordinate-free" one is that it is a homomorphism $\lambda:A\to A^t = Pic^0(A)$ given by some (non-unique) ample divisor $D$, so that $\lambda(a) = \mathcal O_A( T^*_a D - D)$, where $T_a:A\to A$ is the translation by $a\in A$. A polarization is principal if $\lambda$ is an isomorphism.

Then the basic steps, all requiring proof, are:

  1. Every abelian variety (over a field) has a polarization.

  2. $\lambda$ is surjective, and $K(\lambda)=\ker\lambda$ is a finite group subscheme of $A$ of length $d^2$. The degree of $\lambda$ is defined to be $d$. Thus, a polarization is principal iff $d=1$.

  3. $K(\lambda)$ comes with a perfect skew symmetric Weil pairing $b: K(\lambda)\times K(\lambda) \to \mathbb G_m$ with the values in the multiplicative group. "Perfect pairing" means that it defines an iso from $K(\lambda)$ to its Cartier dual.

  4. If $H\subset K(\lambda)$ is a subgroup which is isotropic w.r.t. this pairing (i.e. $b$ restricted to $H\times H$ is trivial), then $\lambda$ descends to a polarization on $B=A/H$ of degree $d/|H|$.

So then it is enough to find a nontrivial isotropic subgroup $H$, replace $A$ by $A/H$, and continue by induction, until you reach $d=1$.

In char 0, this is trivial: just pick any cyclic subgroup in $K(\lambda)$. Since $b$ is skew-symmetric, it is automatically isotropic.

In char p, you need to get into the classification of finite group schemes, and learn the difference between $\mathbb Z/p\mathbb Z$, $\mu_p$, and $\alpha_p$. Once you learn that (Introduction to affine group schemes by Waterhouse is a good source), then you are perhaps ready to read BCnrd's comment-answer.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Over $\mathbb{C}$ the proof of this fact is very simple.

In fact, given any complex Abelian variety $X:= V/\Gamma$ of dimension $g$, one can find strictly positive integers $d_1, \ldots ,d_g$ and a basis $\gamma_1, \ldots ,\gamma_{2g}$ of $\Gamma$ such that the matrix of the Kähler form in this basis is

$\left[\begin{matrix}0 & \Delta \cr - \Delta & 0 \end{matrix}\right],$

where $\Delta$ is the diagonal matrix with diagonal coefficients $d_1, \ldots, d_g$.

Now let $\Gamma'$ be the lattice generated by

$\gamma_1/d_1, \ldots, \gamma_g/d_g, \gamma_{g+1}, \ldots, \gamma_{2g}$

and set $Y:=V/ \Gamma'$.

The Kähler form is integer and unimodular when restricted on $\Gamma'$, hence $Y$ is a principally polarized Abelian variety. Moreover, the natural surjection $X \to Y$ is an isogeny.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .