Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. Is the obvious functor $D(\operatorname{Coh}(X))\to D(\operatorname{QCoh}(X))$ fully faithful?

If this is true then $D(\operatorname{Coh}(X))$ is equivalent to the full subcategory of $D(\operatorname{QCoh}(X))$ consisting of those complexes whose cohomology sheaves are coherent. The bounded above version of the latter statement is here: https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FDA

Are any counterexamples known? If yes, how does one "usually" define the unbounded derived category of coherent sheaves?

P.S. It appears that the "modification" of $D(\operatorname{Coh}(X))$ consisting of those quasi-coherent complexes whose cohomology sheaves are coherent is more "useful". This is the version that is relevant for Grothendieck duality; isn't it?


1 Answer 1


No, not always.


Positselski, Leonid; Schnürer, Olaf M., Unbounded derived categories of small and big modules: is the natural functor fully faithful?, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 225, No. 11, Article ID 106722, 23 p. (2021). ZBL1464.18015.

the authors show in Theorem 3.1 that the natural functor $D(\operatorname{mod}R)\to D(\operatorname{Mod}R)$ is not fully faithful when $R$ is a quasi-Frobenius ring of infinite global dimension (such as $R=\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$).

They also have some positive results. For example, Corollary 5.12 states that $D(\operatorname{coh}X)\to D(\operatorname{Coh}X)$ is fully faithful if $X$ is a regular Noetherian scheme of finite Krull dimension.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.