0
$\begingroup$

Consider a $N\times N$ normalized matrix sample from GOE (the definition see https://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~leticia/TEACHING/Master2019/GOE-cuentas.pdf). If we apply the following result of the edge of the spectrum,

If we denote the $k$ largest eigenvalues by $\lambda_N,\lambda_{n-1},··· ,\lambda_{N-k+1}, $ then for Gaussian ensembles the joint distribution function of rescaled eigenvalues has the limit: $$ \lim_{N\to\infty}P(N^{2/3}(\lambda_N-2)\le s_1,\dots, N^{2/3}(\lambda_{N-k+1}-2)\le s_k)=F_{\beta, k}(s_1,\dots, s_k) $$ where $F_{\beta, k}(s_1,\dots, s_k)$ is the Tracy-Widom distribution.

then we will get the following results by continuous mapping theorem: $$\lambda_N-\lambda_{N-k+1}=O_P(N^{-2/3})$$

Now, if we ordering all eigenvalues by $|\sigma_N|\ge |\sigma_{N-1}|\ge \dots \ge |\sigma_1|$.

I would like have the similar result that for every $\epsilon>0$, there exists constants $C>0,\alpha>0$ so that $$ P\left(N^{\alpha}\left(\frac{|\sigma_N|}{|\sigma_{N-k+1}|}-1\right)\le C\right)\ge 1-\epsilon $$

I am not if we can take $\alpha=2/3$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The Tracy-Widom distribution says that the level spacing near the edge of the spectrum at $\pm 2$ is of order $N^{-2/3}$, hence we may define $$|\sigma_N|\equiv 2+N^{-2/3}\delta,\;\;|\sigma_{N-k+1}|\equiv 2+N^{-2/3}\delta',$$ with $\delta,\delta'$ of order $N^0$. Now consider $$\Delta=N^{2/3}\left(\frac{|\sigma_N|}{|\sigma_{N-k+1}|}-1\right)=\frac{\delta-\delta'}{2+N^{-2/3}\delta'}=\tfrac{1}{2}(\delta-\delta')+{\cal O}(N^{-2/3}).$$ Normalisation requires that $\lim_{C\rightarrow\infty}P(\Delta\leq C)=1$, so for each $\epsilon>0$ we can find a constant $C>0$ so that $$P(\Delta\leq C)\geq 1-\epsilon,$$ which is the desired inequality. The constant $C$ will depend on $\epsilon$, but it will be independent of $N$ for large $N$.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. But I am a little bit confused about if we can still apply the Tracy-Widom law of $k$ largest eigenvalue after taking the absolute value. We know that the largest eigenvalue is near 2. But why $|\sigma_N|$ is still near 2? Also, can you explain why we have $|\sigma_{N-k+1}=2+O(N^{-2/3})$? Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Hermi
    Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ Tracy-Widom applies to the eigenvalues near $+2$ and near $-2$, these have a spacing that is of order $N^{-2/3}$ or smaller; taking the absolute value will give you quantities near $+2$, still with a spacing of order $N^{-2/3}$ or smaller; for fixed $k$ this applies to any $|\sigma_{N-k+1}|$ at large $N$, so $|\sigma_{N-k+1}|=2+{\cal O}(N^{-2/3})$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 17:03
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Can I ask if there is some relevant reference about the Tracy-Widom law for the absolute value of eigenvalue? $\endgroup$
    – Hermi
    Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 17:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ no one has considered that, but it's obvious what happens: the levels near $-2$ are statistically independent from the levels near $+2$; so when you take the absolute value you just superimpose two independent Tracy-Widom distributed sequences; this means there will be no level repulsion, that is the main difference, but for the estimate you are seeking that does not matter. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 18:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Tracy-Widom applies to both edges of the spectrum, the upper edge near 2, and the lower edge near -2. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 6, 2023 at 6:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .