1
$\begingroup$

[Originally posted at math.stackexchange without answer]

Consider a family $\mathcal{F}$ of $n=|\mathcal{F}|$ sets, $\emptyset \not\in \mathcal{F}$ and an universe $U(\mathcal{F})$ of $q=|U(\mathcal{F})|$ elements.

It is known that at least a fraction $r\binom{n}2$, $0 \lt r \lt 1$, of the unordered couples of sets of $\mathcal{F}$, have at least one element in common, i.e. $|\{\{A_1,A_2\}: A_1,A_2 \in \mathcal{F} \land A_1 \not= A_2 \land A_1 \cap A_2 \not= \emptyset \}| \ge r\binom{n}2$.

If we find the lowest $m$ such that:

$$\binom{m}2 \ge \frac{r\binom{n}2}q$$

we can then say that there exists an element belonging to at least $m$ sets of $\mathcal{F}$.

However since those $m$ sets cannot be made of only one element, I think the bound can be improved, i.e. we can say that there is an element in at least $m'$ sets:

$$m' = f(r,n,q) \gt m$$

Any idea for doing that?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Ask another question please. This question and answer are interesting and I think should remain $\endgroup$
    – kodlu
    Commented Feb 6, 2023 at 17:34
  • $\begingroup$ @kodlu ok, I have removed the edit. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 6, 2023 at 19:55

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I do not think the bound can be improved without further assumptions. For example, consider the family $\mathcal{F}$ consisting of all singleton subsets of $\{1, \dots, n-1\}$ together with $\{1, \dots, n-1\}$. Here $q=n-1$, and $r\binom{n}{2}=n-1$. Thus, the smallest $m$ for which $$\binom{m}{2} \geq \frac{r\binom{n}{2}}{q}$$ is $m=2$. However, there is no element which is contained in $3$ sets of $\mathcal{F}$, so the bound is tight.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.