1
$\begingroup$

All the standard counterexamples to flatness that I have seen involve completions with respect to non-finitely generated ideals. I am interested in the following two cases:

  1. Let $A$ be a local ring with finitely generated maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. Is the completion morphism $$ A \rightarrow \hat{A} := \underset{n \in \mathbb{N}}{\mathrm{lim}} \text{ } \frac{A}{\mathfrak{m}^{n+1}} $$ conjectured to be injective? In other words, is Krull's intersection theorem expected to hold?

  2. Let $A$ be a ring and let $I$ be a finitely generated ideal of $A$ such that $A/I$ is Noetherian. Is the completion with respect to $I$ expected to be flat?

Thank you in advance!

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

For question 2. notice that by Stacks 05GH your assumptions imply that $\widehat{A}$ is noetherian. Assume that $A$ is a local ring. If the map $A\rightarrow \widehat{A}$ was always flat, then the assumption that $A$ is local implies it is faithfully flat. But then $A$ is noetherian as well by faithfully flat descent. Thus, for a general ring $A$, using the same argument you would be able to show that all its stalks are noetherian, and hence $A$ is noetherian. Thus this is false in general.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

For 1., take for $A$ the ring of germs of $\mathscr{C}^{\infty}$ functions at $0\in \mathbb{R}$. Then $\mathfrak{m}=(x)$ and $\hat{A}=\mathbb{R}[[x]]$, so the map $A\rightarrow \hat{A}$ is not injective.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.