1
$\begingroup$

Suppose there are 2n vectors $\{m_1,m_2,...,m_n\}$ and $\{\mu_1,\mu_2,...,\mu_n\}$. All vectors are in k-dimensional Euclid space $R^k$. The vectors satisfy: $$m_i \mu_j \leq 0, \quad \forall i\neq j $$ and $$ m_i \mu_i > 0, \quad \forall i.$$

What I want to prove: $n \leq 2k$.

Intuitively I think the bound $n \leq 2k$ is correct. It can be achieved by setting $m_i$ and $\mu_i$ to be the canonical base vectors and their negatives.

As Saul points out, the upper bound actually does not exist in this simplified problem. I post my Orginal Problem in a new post.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $n=k=2$, $m_1=\mu_1=(1,0)$, $m_2=\mu_2=(-1,0)$ is a counterexample. $\endgroup$ Jan 29, 2023 at 22:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Using the canonical basis vectors and their negatives will give you $n = 2k$. Should the inequality be $n \le 2k$? $\endgroup$ Jan 30, 2023 at 0:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Of course, @GerryMyerson you are correct. It was typo, I want to prove $n\leq 2k$, as Robert suggested, not $2n \leq k$. Sorry for the confusion. $\endgroup$
    – TanG
    Jan 30, 2023 at 15:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, you are correct. My apology :) @GerryMyerson $\endgroup$
    – TanG
    Jan 30, 2023 at 15:12

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

You can pack as many vectors $m_i$ and $\mu_i$ as you want in $\mathbb{S}^2=\{x^2+y^2+z^2=1\}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^3$. I leave below an example with $7$ points that generalizes to any finite number of points.

Consider points $m_1,\dots,m_7$ forming a regular heptagon in $\mathbb{S}^2\cap\{z=-0.01\}$. Below is a figure showing how a small neighborhood of the north pole $N=(0,0,1)$ in $\mathbb{S}^2$ would look like, with the lines being the sets $\{v\in\mathbb{S}^2;\langle m_i,v\rangle=0\}$, for $i=1,\dots,7$. Note that $\langle m_i,N\rangle<0\;\forall i$.

enter image description here

Now choose $\mu_i$ in the positions of the seven points from the figure, so that $\langle \mu_i,m_i\rangle>0$ for all $i$ but for $j\neq i$ we have $\langle \mu_i,m_j\rangle<0$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ if a question is correctly stated and answered, it is usually considered "best-practice" to accept the answer. then you can ask a more technical version of your question in a new post. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2023 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you Saul! A very nice example. $\endgroup$
    – TanG
    Feb 11, 2023 at 22:22
  • $\begingroup$ @TanG You are welcome :) I was in the middle of editing my answer. Are you planning on posting a new question in the end? $\endgroup$
    – Saúl RM
    Feb 11, 2023 at 22:25
  • $\begingroup$ @SaúlRM Thanks. Yes, I just post a new question. I've added the link in my question. $\endgroup$
    – TanG
    Feb 11, 2023 at 23:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.