1
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{L}(E)$ be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space $E$. On $\mathcal{L}(E)^2$, we have two equivalent norms: \begin{eqnarray*} N_1(A_1,A_2) &=&\sup\left\{\|A_1x\|^2+\|A_2x\|^2,\;x\in E,\;\|x\|=1\;\right\}, \end{eqnarray*} and $$N_2(A_1,A_2)=\sup\left\{|\langle A_1x,y\rangle|^2+|\langle A_2x,y\rangle|^2,\;x,y\in E,\;\|x\|=\|y\|=1\;\right\}.$$

Assume that $A_1A_2=A_2A_1$ and $A_1$ et $A_2$ are normal operators on $E$. How to show that $$N_1(A_1,A_2)= N_2(A_1,A_2)?$$

My attempt:

Notice that by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality we have always $N_2(A_1,A_2)\leq N_1(A_1,A_2)$.

Now we aim to prove that the converse inequality holds when $A_1A_2=A_2A_1$ and $A_1$ and $A_2$ are normal operators on $E$. I tried to apply the spectral theorem.

Since $A_1$ and $A_2$ are commuting normal operators, il is well known that there exists a suitable measure space $(X,\mu)$; $\mu(X)<\infty$, two functions $\varphi_1,\varphi_2\in L^\infty(\mu)$ and a unitary operator $U:E\longrightarrow L^2(\mu)$, such that each $A_k$ is unitarily equivalent to multiplication by $\varphi_k$, $k=1,2$. i.e. $$UA_kU^*f=\varphi_kf,\;\forall f\in E,\,k=1,2.$$ So, we can write $$A_kf=\varphi_kf,\;\forall f\in L^2(\mu),\,k=1,2.$$ Hence, $$\langle A_kf\;,\;g\rangle=\langle \varphi_kf\;,\;g\rangle=\int_X\varphi_k f\bar{g}d\mu,$$ and $$\|A_kf\|^2=\langle A_kf\;,\;A_kf\rangle=\langle \varphi_kf\;,\;\varphi_kf\rangle=\int_X|\varphi_k|^2|f|^2d\mu.$$

I am trying to solve the following question, but I did not reach to any answer, I would be so glad if anyone could help me on that.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I will follow the OP's initial observation and notation. From the formula $$\|A_1 f\|^2+\|A_2 f\|^2=\int_X\left(|\varphi_1|^2+|\varphi_2|^2\right)|f|^2$$ it is clear that $$N_2(A_1,A_2)\leq N_1(A_1,A_2)\leq\mathrm{ess}\sup\left(|\varphi_1|^2+|\varphi_2|^2\right).$$ Hence it suffices to show that, for any $\varepsilon>0$, we have $$N_2(A_1,A_2)>\mathrm{ess}\sup\left(|\varphi_1|^2+|\varphi_2|^2\right)-\varepsilon.$$ Let $C$ denote the essential supremum on the right-hand side. By definition, there is a set $U\subset X$ of positive measure on which $|\varphi_1|^2+|\varphi_2|^2$ is at least $C-\varepsilon/2$ (pointwise). This set has a subset $V\subset U$ of positive measure such that both $\varphi_1(V)\subset\mathbb{C}$ and $\varphi_2(V)\subset\mathbb{C}$ can be covered by a disk of radius $\sqrt{\varepsilon}/4$. Then, $$\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V|\varphi_k|^2-\left|\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V\varphi_k\right|^2=\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V\left|\varphi_k-\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V\varphi_k\right|^2\leq\varepsilon/4$$ shows that $$\left|\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V\varphi_1\right|^2+\left|\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V\varphi_2\right|^2\geq\frac{1}{\mu(V)}\int_V\left(|\varphi_1|^2+|\varphi_2|^2\right)-\varepsilon/2\geq C-\varepsilon.$$ Choosing both $f$ and $g$ to be the $L^2$-normalized indicator function $\mathbf{1}_V/\sqrt{\mu(V)}$, the previous inequality becomes $$|\langle A_1f,g\rangle|^2+|\langle A_2f,g\rangle|^2\geq C-\varepsilon.$$ The proof is complete.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.