6
$\begingroup$

The Nash-Tognoli theorem states that every closed and smooth manifold is diffeomorphic to a real algebraic variety. This appears to me as a very strong and surprising fact. However, I am not aware of any consequences, yet I have also been almost completely ignorant towards real algebraic geometry.

Question: What are nice consequences of the Nash-Tognoli theorem?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

7
$\begingroup$

I do not know about "nice" (which is a matter of taste) but one can prove (using the N-T theorem) that if $M$ is a smooth closed manifold, then there exists a polygonal linkage $L$ such that the moduli space $M(L)$ of planar realizations of $L$ has a component diffeomorphic to $M$. Bill Thurston named it "an airplane theorem." See

Kapovich, Michael; Millson, John J., Universality theorems for configuration spaces of planar linkages, Topology 41, No. 6, 1051-1107 (2002). ZBL1056.14077.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Why "an airplane theorem"? Why "airplane"? I don't see the connection... Thanks for clarifying! $\endgroup$ Jan 27 at 22:13
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @JosephO'Rourke: Imagine you are flying in an airplane (as a passenger!) and you have a conversation with a person occupying a seat next to you. At some point, your neighbor asks you "What do you do for living?" You answer, "I am a mathematician, a topologist." The natural responce is something like "what's that?" or even "you mean a topographer?" What could you tell them? Thurston's answer would be along the lines "Let me give you an example. For instance, I can show how to build a bar-and-joint mechanism that can forge your signature." That's why it's an "airplane theorem." $\endgroup$
    – Misha
    Jan 27 at 22:30
  • $\begingroup$ :-) ${}{}{}{}{}$ $\endgroup$ Jan 28 at 1:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Incidentally, Zach Abel proved in his Ph.D. thesis that the linkage can be truly planar in that bars do not cross one another. $\endgroup$ Jan 28 at 1:14
  • $\begingroup$ @JosephO'Rourke: Thank you for reminding me the name! $\endgroup$
    – Misha
    Jan 28 at 4:26
6
$\begingroup$

While not relying on Nash-Tognoli, that theorem makes something like the Brieskorn spheres inevitable. Though it is still surprising how simple are the polynomials that cut out exotic $S^7$'s in $\mathbb{C}^5$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ There are also similarly simple polynomials in 5 variables which cut out nonsmoothable PL manifolds, see here. $\endgroup$ Jan 28 at 4:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.