8
$\begingroup$

I got from my children as a gift a puzzle consisting of 25 y-shaped 5-polyominoes that form a $5 \times 5 \times 5$-cube (see picture).

I'm wondering for which $n$ does a y-formed $n$-polyomino tile a $n \times n \times n$-cube?

By a y-formed $n$-polyomino I understand a generalisation of the y-formed $5$-polyomino (made of the $5$ squares $(0, 0), (1, 0), (2, 0), (3, 0), (1, 1)$), i.e., the center of the $n$ squares can be chosen as $(0,0), (1,0), (1,1), (2,0), \dotsc, (n-2,0)$. The polyomino has a thickness of 1.

For $n=5$ I have the (wooden) proof that it's possible before me, for $n=4$ it's trivial (as one can tile one $4 \times 4 \times 1$-slice of the $4 \times 4 \times 4$-cube already with four y-formed $4$-polyominoes), what about $n=6, 7 , \dotsc$?

Any ideas for patterns that work for whole sequences of $n$, any proofs that for some $n$ it's not possible?

 A 5×5×5-cube tiled by 25 y-shaped 5-polyominoes

$\endgroup$
7
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Using Don Knuth's implementation of Algorithm X, I've verified that there are no solutions for $n=6$ and $n=7$. Also, Michael Reid has a webpage with many ways of packing various polycubes into boxes. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 24, 2023 at 21:52
  • $\begingroup$ I did not know what a y-shaped polyomino was except from the picture, so I have edited in a description in words, which is hopefully correct. I am confused by the reference to the centre of the squares. Do you mean to say that the generalised polyomino has the squares $(0, 0), (1, 0), \dotsc, (n - 2, 0), (i, 1)$ for some integer $i$ with $0 \le i < n - 1$? $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 17:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ My interpretation was: a y-formed $n$-polyomino is given by the $n-1$ cells $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$, …, $(n-2,0)$, together with the cell $(1,1)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 18:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I certainly have no objection to that formulation, if it is what was intended! However, then I didn't know how to make sense of the terminology "the center of the squares can be chosen as $(0, 0), (1, 0), \dotsc, (n - 2, 0)$"; what is the choice that is being made? (That is, what is the ‘centre’?) Anyway, all I wanted is to make sure I understood the statement. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 18:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Many thanks for improving my formulation, and sorry that my original one was not crystal clear. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 27, 2023 at 15:48

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

There are no solutions for $n\ge6$. For $n=6$ one checks that the exact cover formulation of the problem has no solution, as ho boon suan did in the comment.

For $n\ge7$, the following argument works: Let $(i,j,k)$ for $1\le i,j,k\le n$ be the $n^3$ positions of the cube to be covered. Consider the subset $S$ of positions $(i,j,k)$ where $i,j,k\in\{1, 4, n\}$. Each polyomino intersects $S$ in either $0$ or $2$ positions. As $\lvert S\rvert=27$ is odd, there is no cover.

There are also choices of $S$ which are symmetric under the symmetries of the cube:

If $n$ is odd, then for $S=\{(i,j,k)\;|\;i,j,k\in\{1,(n+1)/2,n\}\}$ we get $\lvert S\rvert=27$, while $\lvert S\cap P\rvert=0$ or $2$ for each polyomino.

If $n$ is even, then for $S=\{(i,j,k)\;|\;i,j,k\in\{1,n/2,n/2+1,n\}\}$ we get $\lvert S\rvert=64$, while $\lvert S\cap P\rvert=0$ or $3$ for each polyomino.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ This makes rough sense to me, but I think I'm having a little bit of trouble visualizing: what in the argument needs $n\geq7$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 19:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thinking of the y-polyomino as a straight line of $n-1$ cubes, say along the $x$-axis, together with an extra protruding cube, that cube can only have $x$-coordinates in $\{2,3,n-2,n-1\}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 19:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @StevenStadnicki To complement ho boon suan's comment: If $n=6$ then $n−2=4$, so it can happen that the polyomino hits S (in its "extra protruding cube") in only one point. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterMueller Thank you! That's exactly the bit that I was missing. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 27, 2023 at 18:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .