3
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a non-archimedean field and let $\pi$ be a self-dual supercuspidal representation of $\mathrm{GL}_n(F)$ (which, by a result of Adler exists only when $n=1$ or $n$ is even). Then, under LLC for $\mathrm{GL}_n$ we obtain a $n$-dimensional irreducible self-dual representation $\varphi_\pi$ of the Weil group $W_F$.

Is there an interpretation of the Frobenius-Schur indicator of $\varphi_\pi$ in terms of the representation $\pi$?

It is not naively the Frobenius-Schur indicator of the representation $\pi$, since Corollary 9 of Mishra "A note on sign of a self-dual representation" says the Frobenius-Schur indicator of $\pi$ is always $1$.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Prasad and Ramakrishnan (arXiv link) study how the signs of (discrete series) representations behave along the local Langlands correspondence, not just for GL($n$), but for all inner forms. Assume the base field has characteristic 0.

If $n$ is odd, $\pi$ and its Langlands parameter have the same sign.

If $n$ is even, you need to use the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence (at least to use Prasad-Ramakrishnan's result to get the sign of the parameter). Since $\pi$ is supercuspidal, then it corresponds to a representation $\pi_D$ on a division algebra $D$, which does not always have the same sign as $\pi$. Here the signs of $\pi_D$ and the Langlands parameter are opposite.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.