5
$\begingroup$

Let $F_n^{(k)}(x)= \sum_j {\binom{n+(k-1)j}{kj} x^j}$ and $G_n^{(k)}(x)= \sum_j {\binom{n+j}{kj} x^j}.$

I am interested in the coefficients ${a_{n,k,j}}$ such that $$G_n^{(k)}(x)=\sum_{j\geq0 }{a_{n,k,j}} F_j^{(k)}((-1)^ { k}x).$$ Computations suggest the following:

Let $z\sum_{j\geq 0}C_{1,j}^{(k)}z^j$ be the inverse series of $\sum_{j=1}^k (-1)^{j-1}z^j$ and let $(\sum_{j\geq 0}C_{1,j}^{(k)}z^j)^m=\sum_{j\geq 0}C_{m,j}^{(k)}z^j.$ Then $$ a_{n,k,j}=(-1)^{k j}C_{kj+1,n-(k-1)j}^{(k-1)}.$$ Any idea how to prove this?

Remark: $C_{1,n}^{(2)}=C_n$ are the Catalan numbers and

$( C_{1,n}^{(3)})_{n\geq 0}=(1,1,1,0,-4,-14,-30,-33,\dots).$ (cf. OEIS, A103779).

Edit: Perhaps the following observation may be useful. A matrix inversion theorem of Gould and Hsu implies a similar result: The coefficients $c_{n,k,j}$ which give $$\sum_j {c_{n,k,j}} F_j^{(k)}(x)=x^n$$ are $(-1)^{n-j} A_{n-j,k,kj+1}$ where $A_{n,k,r}=\frac{r}{kn+r}\binom{kn+r}{n}$ are Fuss-Catalan numbers. Here we have $\sum_{n}A_{n,k,r}x^n=(\sum_{n}A_{n,k,1}x^n)^r $ and $ x\sum_{n}A_{n,k,1}x^{(k-1)n}$ is the inverse series of $y-y^k.$ Is there a combinatorial or other reason for the appearance of these special inverse series?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The inverse series $y(x) = x-x^k= x(1-x^{k-1})$ is the compositional inverse of the invertible o.g.f. of aerated (k)-Fuss-Catalan sequences with the Catalans corresponding to $k=2$. See, e.g., oeis.org/A001764. Proofs usually simplify using this observation or by resorting to a higher algebra of sets of partition polynomials for which the Fuss-Catalan sequences are 'diagonal' coefficients. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 1, 2023 at 1:59
  • $\begingroup$ The combinatorial import of the inverse series is evident from the combinatorial models for compositional inversion via A133437 and OEIS A134264, e.g., associahedra and noncrossing partitions. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 1, 2023 at 6:18

1 Answer 1

3
+50
$\begingroup$

These assertions can be proved using (formal) generating functions. Using that for $j\geq 0, k\geq 1$ \begin{align*} \sum_{n\geq 0} {n-j+kj \choose kj} t^n &=\frac{t^j}{(1-t)^{kj+1} }\;\;\mbox{ and }\\ \sum_{n\geq 0}{n+j \choose kj} t^n&=\frac{t^{kj-j}}{(1-t)^{kj+1}}\;\;\;, \end{align*} gives that \begin{align*} \sum_{n\geq 0} t^n F_n^{(k)}(x) &=\frac{1}{1-t}\,\frac{1}{1-\frac{xt}{(1-t)^k}}\;\;\mbox{ and }\\ \sum_{n\geq 0} t^n G_n^{(k)}(x) &=\frac{1}{1-t}\,\frac{1}{1-\frac{xt^{k-1}}{(1-t)^k}}\;\;\;, \end{align*}

(I) consider first the (simpler) Gould-Hsu case. Here $c_{n,k,j}= (-1)^{n-j} [t^{n-j} ]\, C_k(t)^{kj+1}$ where $C_k(t)$ denotes the $k$-ary tree function, which is defined by $$C_k(t)=1+tC_k(t)^k\;\;\;.$$ Thus \begin{align*} \sum_{j\geq 0} c_{n,k,j} F_j^{(k)}(x)&=\sum_{j\geq 0} F_j^{(k)}(x)(-1)^{n-j}[t^{n-j}]C_k(t)^{kj+1}\\ &=\sum_{j\geq 0} F_j^{(k)}(x)(-1)^{n-j}[t^{n}] t^j C_k(t)^{kj+1}\\ &=(-1)^n [t^n] \sum_{j\geq 0} F_j^{(k)}(x)(-1)^{j}t^j C_k(t)^{kj+1}\\ &=(-1)^n [t^n] \frac{C_k(t)}{1+tC_k(t)^k}\frac{1}{1+\frac{xtC_k(t)^k}{(1+tC_k(t)^k)}^k}\\ &=(-1)^n [t^n] \frac{1}{1+xt}=x^n\\ \end{align*}

(II) now to your case above. Here $a_{n,k,j}=(-1)^{kj}[t^{n-(k-1)j}] A_{k-1}(t)^{kj+1}$ where $yA_k(y)$ is the inverse of $y(z)=\sum_{j=1}^k (-1)^{j-1} z^j$ . A similar computation as above here gives \begin{align*} \sum_{j\geq 0} a_{n,k,j} F_j^{(k)}((-1)^kx)&=[t^n] \frac{A_{k-1}(t)}{1-T(t)} \frac{1}{1- (-1)^k\frac{T(t)x}{(1-T(t))^k}} \end{align*} where $T(t):=(-1)^kt^{k-1}A_{k-1}(t)^k$. This will simplify to the generating function for the $G_n^{(k)}$ if
$$\frac{A_{k-1}(t)}{1-T(t)}=\frac{1}{1-t}\;\;.$$ And this in turn follows (for $k\geq 2$) with simple steps after substituting $x=tA_{k-1}(t)$ in the equality $$t=\frac{x+(-1)^{k-1}x^k}{1+x}$$.

(III) The Ansatz $b_{n,k,j}=[t^n] T(t)^j Z(t)$ leads to the generating function \begin{align*} \frac{Z(t)}{1-T(t)} \frac{1}{1- \frac{T(t)x}{(1-T(t))^k}} \end{align*} for $R_n(x):=\sum_{j \geq 0} b_{n,k,j} F_j^{(k)}(x)$. One will expect this to be a simple function of $t$ only if $\frac{Z(t)}{1-T(t)}$ and $\frac{T(t)}{(1-T(t))^k}$ simplify to simple functions of $t$, i.e. can be "solved" for $t$. The targetet generating functions more or less require that $Z=C_k, T=-tC_k^k $ in case (I), resp. that $Z=A_{k-1}, T=-t^{k-1}A_{k-1}$ in case (II), this explains the appearance of these special inverse series.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for this beautiful answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2023 at 9:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .