3
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have a system of differential equations for the unknowns $(x_1,v_1,\ldots,x_N,v_N)$ (interpreted as the positions & velocities of $N$ labeled particles), $$\begin{cases}\dot{x}_{i,\epsilon} = v_{i,\epsilon} \\ \dot{v}_{i,\epsilon} = \displaystyle-\frac{1}{\epsilon}\sum_{1\leq j\leq N} \nabla W(x_{i,\epsilon}-x_{j,\epsilon}) \\ (x_{i,\epsilon},v_{i,\epsilon})\vert_{t=0} = (x_i^0,v_i^0), \end{cases} \qquad 1\leq i\leq N. \tag{1}$$ Above, $\epsilon>0$ is small parameter, and for simplicity, let's assume that the positions $x_{i,\epsilon}\in \mathbb{T}^d$ ($[-\frac12,\frac12]^d$ with periodic boundary conditions) and $v_{i,\epsilon}\in\mathbb{R}^d$. $W$ is some function, the exact form is not so important for formulating the question.

Multiplying both sides of the second equation by $\epsilon$ and sending $\epsilon\rightarrow 0$, I would formally expect that $(x_{i,\epsilon},v_{i,\epsilon})_{i=1}^N$ to converge to a solution $(x_i,v_i)_{i=1}^N$ of the system. $$\begin{cases}\dot{x}_i = v_i \\ \displaystyle0 = -\sum_{1\leq j\leq N}\nabla W(x_i-x_j) \\ (x_i,v_i)\vert_{t=0} = (x_i^0,v_i^0), \end{cases} \qquad 1\leq i\leq N.\tag{2}$$ Introducing the potential energy $$P = \frac12\sum_{1\leq i,j\leq N} W(x_i-x_j),$$ the second equation of (2) says that $(x_i)_{i=1}^N$ is a critical point of $P$ for all time. So the $N$ particles are just translated in space through the set of critical points of the potential energy.

I'm interested in references that have studied these singular limit problems and, in particular, the assumptions on $W$ needed to show convergence.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This seems similar to Friedlin-Wentzell LDs for SDEs. $\endgroup$
    – user479223
    Commented Dec 23, 2022 at 0:23
  • $\begingroup$ @user479223: Would you please elaborate more on the connection you have in mind? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2022 at 21:21

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

A couple of comments and some literature pointers:

First, maybe you were already aware, but such singular limit problems are studied under the name "singular perturbation theory". An introduction are the lecture notes "Geometric singular perturbation theory" by Christopher K. R. T. Jones (1995).

Further, I'd only expect the system to converge to critical points of $P$, if these points are actually local minima. Since this is a problem described by a potential, it reminds me of the article "Motion under the influence of a strong constraining force" by Floris Takens (1980) in Springer Lecture Notes in Math. vol 819. Actually with that paper in mind, solutions might not really converge to local minima of $P$, but oscillate around them instead.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, Jaap, for your comments. One thing that confuses me is the determination of the velocities in the limit as $\epsilon\rightarrow 0$. Unlike some of the assumptions I encounter in the literature on singular perturbation theory, the second equation in (2) doesn't specify the $v_i$. If we believe that the limiting trajectories of the particles lie in the set of critical points of the energy, then the velocities of the particles must be consistent with this constraint. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 28, 2022 at 18:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .