5
$\begingroup$

Let $\zeta_p$ be a $p$-th root of unity for a prime $p$, let $L:=\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p)$ and $K$ the maximal totally real subfield of $L$, i.e. $K:=\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p+\zeta_p^{-1})$. I am trying to prove that the narrow class number of $K$ divides the class number of $L$ i.e. $h_{K}^+\mid h_L$.

I was trying to show that if $F$ is an extension of $K$ which is unramified at all finite primes, then $F(\zeta_p)$ will be an extension of $L$ which is unramified at all primes. However, I am not sure how to prove this. Any help would be much appreciated!

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please use a high-level tag like "nt.number-theory". I added this tag now. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Dec 19, 2022 at 1:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since $L/K$ is ramified at $p$, the Hilbert class field in the strict sense is disjoint from $L/K$. This proves the claim since any ramification at infinite primes is killed by $L/K$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 19, 2022 at 11:13

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

To prove that $F(\zeta_p)$ is an extension of $L$ which is unramified at all primes, it is enough to show that $F(\zeta_p)$ is an extension of $L$ which is unramified at all finite primes, because all finite primes are the only primes that can ramify.

To show that $F(\zeta_p)$ is an extension of $L$ which is unramified at all finite primes, we can use the following criterion: If $F$ is a Galois extension of $K$ which is unramified at all finite primes, then $F(\zeta_p)$ is an extension of $L$ which is unramified at all finite primes. This criterion can be proved as follows:

Let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a prime of $L$ which lies above a prime $\mathfrak{P}$ of $F$. We want to show that $\mathfrak{p}$ is unramified in $F(\zeta_p)$.

Since $F$ is a Galois extension of $K$, the decomposition group of $\mathfrak{P}$ in $F$ is equal to the Galois group of $F/K$. Since $F$ is unramified at all finite primes, the decomposition group of $\mathfrak{P}$ in $F$ is a subgroup of the inertia group of $\mathfrak{P}$ in $F$.

On the other hand, the Galois group of $F(\zeta_p)/L$ is equal to the Galois group of $F/K$ by the Galois correspondence, so the decomposition group of $\mathfrak{p}$ in $F(\zeta_p)$ is equal to the Galois group of $F/K$.

Since the decomposition group of $\mathfrak{p}$ in $F(\zeta_p)$ is equal to the decomposition group of $\mathfrak{P}$ in $F$, which is a subgroup of the inertia group of $\mathfrak{P}$ in $F$, it follows that the decomposition group of $\mathfrak{p}$ in $F(\zeta_p)$ is a subgroup of the inertia group of $\mathfrak{p}$ in $F(\zeta_p)$. This means that $\mathfrak{p}$ is unramified in $F(\zeta_p)$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. I am wondering, what if $F$ is not a Galois extension, is it possible to extend the argument, or it is not needed when considering the maximal unramified extension (for the narrow class number)? $\endgroup$
    – did
    Commented Dec 19, 2022 at 8:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.