5
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be a homotopy ring spectrum. Then the homology theory $A_\ast : Spectra \to GrAb$ lifts to a homology theory valued in $GrMod(\pi_\ast A)$. If $A$ is homotopy commutative, then this functor $A_\ast : Spectra \to GrMod(\pi_\ast A)$ is lax monoidal. But it makes sense to ask for a lax monoidal structure on this functor even if $A$ is not homotopy commutative, so long as $\pi_\ast A$ is graded-commutative. And the answer can be yes --e.g. at the prime 2, Morava $K$-theory $K(n)$ is not homotopy commutative, but $K(n)_\ast$ is strong monoidal.

Question: Let $A$ be a homotopy ring spectrum such that $\pi_\ast A$ is graded-commutative. Then is the functor $A_\ast : Spectra \to GrMod_{\pi_\ast A}$ lax monoidal? Even lax symmetric monoidal?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I believe the answer is no for Morava K-theory at the prine 2 $\endgroup$ Dec 1, 2022 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ @MaximeRamzi wait really? $\endgroup$
    – Tim Campion
    Dec 1, 2022 at 22:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ See the discussion on page 15 of arxiv.org/pdf/2008.00330.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Drew Heard
    Dec 2, 2022 at 7:48
  • $\begingroup$ @DrewHeard : do you know if there's any chance of a "general"(-ish) statement of this form ? Like "if A is a homotopy ring spectrum such that blah, then $A_*$ can be made symmetric monoidal with values in some category of graded modules over some Hopf algebra ..." ? Anything that's not "$A$ is Morava $K$-theory" would be neat :D $\endgroup$ Dec 2, 2022 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ Like maybe some hypotheses that allow to control the failure of (homotopy) commutativity of $A$ in the homotopy groups $\endgroup$ Dec 2, 2022 at 9:20

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

As pointed out in the comments, the functor $A_*$ cannot in general be lax symmetric monoidal without making some alterations.

Here is an incomplete discussion of when $A_*$ can be lax monoidal.

The first observation is that, for any homotopy associative ring spectrum $A$, the functor $A_*$ naturally takes values in $\pi_* A$-bimodules. The left and right actions of $A$ on itself produce natural left and right actions of $A$ on $A \otimes X$ for any $X$, and lax monoidality of $\pi_*$ show that $A_* X$ is then a $\pi_* A$-bimodule.

The second observation is that this makes the functor $A_*$ a lax monoidal functor to the category of $\pi_* A$-bimodules. The homotopy associativity of $A$ ensures that the two composites $A \otimes A \otimes A \to A \otimes A \to A$ are homotopic, and so for any $X$ and $Y$ the two composites $$ (A \otimes X) \otimes A \otimes (A \otimes Y) \to (A \otimes X) \otimes (A \otimes Y) \to A \otimes (X \otimes Y) $$ are homotopic. The lax monoidality of $\pi_*$ then tells us that the two composites $$ A_* X \otimes \pi_* A \otimes A_* Y \to A_*(X \otimes Y) $$ are equal, establishing $\pi_* A$-bilinearity. However, tracking which maps actually appear on the spectrum level, this specifically uses the right $\pi_* A$-module structure on $A_* X$ and the left $\pi_* A$-module structure on $A_* Y$.

We now assume that the coefficient ring $\pi_* A$ is graded-commutative. We would like to show that, for any $X$, the left and right module structures "coincide": $a \cdot x = \pm x \cdot a$ for any $a \in \pi_* A$ and $x \in A_* X$ according to the Koszul sign rule. If we can do this, then bimodule bilinearity collapses to module bilinearity.

Suppose $x \in A_d X$ comes from a map $S^d \to A \otimes X$. We can express $A$ as a filtered hocolim of finite spectra $A_i$, and get a lift to a map $S^d \to A_i \otimes X$, with an adjoint map $DA_i \otimes S^d \to X$ using Spanier-Whitehead duality. This gives us a lift of $x$ to a factorization $$ S^d \to \xrightarrow{\eta} A \otimes (DA_i \otimes S^d) \to A \otimes X. $$ Therefore, it suffices to check this in the "universal" cases where $x \in A_* (DA_i)$ comes from the canonical map $\eta: S^0 \to A \otimes DA_i$.

This lifts to the limit over $i$, however: the canonical unit map $S^0 \to map(A,A)$ to the function spectrum. In these terms, we are asking if the canonical element $1 \in [A,A]$ is sent to the same element under post-multiplication by $a$ on either the left or the right; or equivalently, if "multiply by $a$ on the left" and "multiply by $a$ on the right" are always homotopic maps $A \to A$, rather than merely giving equal maps $\pi_* A \to \pi_* A$.


An example of this can be constructed from the following differential graded algebra. Start with the discrete ring $\Bbb Z[x]$. We first form a bimodule with a single generator $y$, annihilated by $x$ on the left and right; we form a second bimodule with a single generator $z$, annihilated by $x^2$ on the left and $x$ on the right (so it has a basis $\{z,xz\}$). Form the mapping cone $M$ of the map $z \mapsto 2y$: it has $H_0 = \Bbb Z/2$, generated by $y$, and $H_1 = \Bbb Z$, generated by $xz$. Let $A$ be the square-zero extension $\Bbb Z[x] \times M$ by this differential graded bimodule $M$. The coefficient ring is graded-commutative because almost all products are zero. However, in mod-$2$ homology we see the element $z$ which no longer commutes with the generator $x$ from $A_*$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks! At least we see that the condition "$\pi_\ast(A)$ is graded-commutative" is not sufficient to ensure that $A_\ast$ is lax monoidal, even non-symmetrically. Which heightens the mystery for me -- is $K(n)_\ast$ lax monoidal when $p = 2$, and if so why?... $\endgroup$
    – Tim Campion
    Dec 3, 2022 at 0:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TimCampion For K(n) you are fine. Another way to express this is that we are checking the composite $$A_* \otimes A_*^{op} \to \pi_*(A \otimes A^{op}) \to \pi_* end(A).$$ $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2022 at 2:26
  • $\begingroup$ In the case of Morava K-theory, we have only one generator to check ($v_n$) and its two images in $\pi_*(K(n) \otimes K(n)^{op})$ are equal as a consequence of the formulas for the right unit for $BP_* BP$. (So, I believe, for genuinely interesting reasons!) $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2022 at 2:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.