10
$\begingroup$

Assume that $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1$ for two positive real numbers $p,q$.

For what kind of $C^*$ algebras $A$ does the following hold:

$$\frac{ab+ba}{2}\leq \frac{a^p}{p}+\frac{b^q}{q}$$ $\forall a,b\in A^+$?

As a second question we pose the trace version of this question:

Let $A$ be a $C^*$ algebra with a faithful trace. Is it true to say that for every two positive elements $a$, $b$ we have the following inequality? $$\DeclareMathOperator\trace{trace}\trace(ab)\leq \frac{\trace(a^p)}{p} +\frac{\trace(b^q)}{q}$$

$\endgroup$
6
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Are there other integers $p, q$ with $\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1$ except $p = q = 2$ ? $\endgroup$ Dec 1, 2022 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ @InfiniteLooper Thank you I was mistaken I revise it $\endgroup$ Dec 1, 2022 at 16:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The inequality holds for $p=q=2$ since $0 \leq (a-b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 - ab - ba$, and it holds in all commutative $C^*$-algebras by Young's inequality. When $\min\{1/p, 1/q\} < (\sqrt{2}-1)\sqrt{2}/4 \approx 0.146$ I can show (quite ad hoc) that it fails for all non-commutative $C^*$-algebras, so I kind of suspect that when $p\neq q$ then it fails for all non-commutative $C^*$-algebras. The inequality for tracial states holds by [Farenick, Douglas R., Manjegani, S. Mahmoud, Young's inequality in operator algebras. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 20 (2005), no. 2, 107–124]. $\endgroup$
    – Jamie Gabe
    Dec 2, 2022 at 16:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just to expand on the failure when $\min\{1/p, 1/q\}$ is small (I'm hoping it will inspire someone else to come up with a proof), any non-commutative $C^*$-algebra has a $C^*$-subalgebra which contains $M_2(\mathbb C)$ as a quotient, so it suffices to show the failure in $M_2(\mathbb C)$. Here I took $a = e_{1,1}$ and $b = \tfrac{1}{2} \sum_{i,j} e_{i,j}$ and asked Maple to compute the eigenvalues of $(1-t)a + tb - \tfrac{1}{2} (ab+ba)$ and observed that there is a negative eigenvalue for $\min \{ t, 1-t \} < (\sqrt{2}-1)\sqrt{2}/4$. $\endgroup$
    – Jamie Gabe
    Dec 2, 2022 at 16:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One can improve on the argument I did above in $M_2(\mathbb C)$ (general case is still open, though). In fact, if one uses the projections $a=e_{1,1}$ and $b= \left( \begin{array}{cc} 3/4 & \sqrt{3}/4 \\ \sqrt{3}/4 & 1/4 \end{array} \right)$, and again compute the eigenvalues of $(1-t)a + tb - \tfrac{1}{2} (ab+ba)$, then there are negative eigenvalues when $\min\{ t, 1-t\} < 1/4$. So the inequality from the question fails in all non-commutative $C^\ast$-algebras whenever $\min\{1/p, 1/q\} < 1/4$. $\endgroup$
    – Jamie Gabe
    Dec 2, 2022 at 19:19

1 Answer 1

13
$\begingroup$

Let me expand slightly on the comments I made above, and give the most general solution.

Clearly the inequality $\frac{ab + ba}{2} \leq \frac{a^2}{2} + \frac{b^2}{2}$ holds for all positive elements $a,b$ in a $C^\ast$-algebra since $a-b$ is self-adjoint and therefore $0\leq (a-b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 - ab - ba$.

Also (just to get it out of the way before we get technical), the paper [Farenick, Douglas R., Manjegani, S. Mahmoud, Young's inequality in operator algebras. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 20 (2005), no. 2, 107–124] shows that for all $p,q >1$ with $\tfrac{1}{p} + \tfrac{1}{q} = 1$ all $C^\ast$-algebras $A$ with a faithful tracial state $\tau$, the inequality $\tau(ab) \leq \frac{\tau(a^p)}{p} + \frac{\tau(b^q)}{q}$ holds for all $a,b\in A_+$.

Here comes the technical part:

Proposition: Let $A$ be a $C^\ast$-algebra and let $p,q>1$ such that $\tfrac{1}{p} + \tfrac{1}{q} = 1$ and $p\neq q$. Then the inequality $\frac{ab+ba}{2} \leq \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}$ holds for all $a,b\in A_+$ if and only if $A$ is commutative.

Proof: If $A$ is commutative, then $A \cong C_0(X)$ for some locally compact Hausdorff space $X$, and the inequality in question holds by Young's inequality since the order relation $\leq$ in $C_0(X)$ is the pointwise $\leq$ of complex numbers.

Conversely, suppose $A$ is non-commutative. A classical result (which I think might go back to Kadison (I have added a proof below)) shows that $A$ contains a $C^\ast$-subalgebra which surjects onto $M_2(\mathbb C)$. As positive elements in quotients of $C^\ast$-algebras lift to positive elements (by functional calculus), it suffices to witness the failure of our desired inequality in $M_2(\mathbb C)$.

Assume without loss of generality that $p>2$. Let $a(\epsilon) = \left(\begin{array}{cc} \epsilon & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end{array}\right)$ for $\epsilon>0$ and $b = \left(\begin{array}{cc} 1/2 & 1/2 \\ 1/2 & 1/2 \end{array}\right)$. We will show that $a(\epsilon)$ and $b$ fail the inequality for sufficiently small $\epsilon$. Note that $a(\epsilon)^p = a(\epsilon^p)$ and that $b^q = b$ (since $b$ is a projection). So we should verify that the \begin{equation} \frac{a(\epsilon^p)}{p} + \frac{b}{q} - \tfrac{1}{2}(a(\epsilon)b + ba(\epsilon)) = \left( \begin{array}{cc} \tfrac{\epsilon^p}{p} + \tfrac{1}{2q} - \tfrac{\epsilon}{2} & \tfrac{1}{2q} - \tfrac{\epsilon}{4} \\ \tfrac{1}{2q} - \tfrac{\epsilon}{4} & \tfrac{1}{2q} \end{array} \right) \end{equation} is not positive semidefinite for small $\epsilon$. We do this by showing that it has a negative determinant. In fact, the determinant of the above matrix is \begin{equation} \frac{\epsilon^p}{2pq} + \frac{1}{4q^2} -\frac{\epsilon}{4q} - \frac{1}{4q^2} - \frac{\epsilon^2}{16} + \frac{\epsilon}{4q} = \epsilon^2 (\frac{\epsilon^{p-2}}{2pq} - \frac{1}{16}) \end{equation} and this is clearly negative for sufficiently small $\epsilon >0$. QED.

ADDON: Upon request I will add the following which I think is due to Kadison (the driving force is Kadison transitivity). I have added most details, but some minor elementary things are left for the reader.

Proposition: Let $A$ be a $C^\ast$-algebra. The following are equivalent:

(i) $A$ is non-commutative;

(ii) there exists an irreducible representation $\pi \colon A \to \mathcal B(H)$ where $\mathrm{dim}(H) \geq 2$;

(iii) $A$ contains a (non-zero) nilpotent element;

(iv) there exists a $C^\ast$-subalgebra $B \subseteq A$ which contains a two-sided closed ideal $J$ such that $B/J \cong M_2(\mathbb C)$.

Proof: (iv) $\Rightarrow$ (i) is obvious, (i) $\Rightarrow$ (ii) is standard (irreducible representations separate points, so if every irreducible representation is 1-dimensional, then all commutators $ab-ba$ in $A$ vanish).

(ii) $\Rightarrow$ (iii): Fix an irreducible representation $\pi \colon A \to \mathcal B(H)$ where $\mathrm{dim}(H) \geq 2$. Let $\xi, \eta \in H$ be orthogonal unit vectors. By Kadison transitivity there are elements $a,b\in A$ such that \begin{equation} \pi(a) \xi = \tfrac{1}{2}\xi , \quad \pi(a) \eta = \eta, \quad \pi(b) \xi = \eta \quad \pi(b) \eta = \xi. \end{equation} Replacing $a$ with $|a|$ we may assume $a\geq 0$. Let $f,g\in C_0((0,\|a\|])$ such that $fg = 0$ and $f(1/2) = 1$ and $g(1) = 1$. I claim that $x= f(a) b g(a) \in A$ is nilpotent of order 2. In fact, clearly $x^2 = 0$ since $g(a) f(a) = 0$ (by functional calculus), so we should show that $x\neq 0$. Since $f(\pi(a)) \xi = \xi$ and $g(\pi(a)) \eta = \eta$ we have \begin{equation} \pi(x) \eta = f(\pi(a)) \pi(b) g(\pi(a)) \eta = f(\pi(a)) \pi(b) \eta = f(\pi(a)) \xi = \xi \end{equation} so $x\neq 0$.

(iii) $\Rightarrow$ (iv): Represent $A\subseteq \mathcal B(H)$ faithfully (not the same $H$ as above), and let $x\in A$ be a nilpotent element of order 2. We may assume $\|x\| =1$. Let $x = u|x|$ be the polar decomposition of $x$ in $\mathcal B(H)$. Then $u$ is a partial isometry with orthogonal range and source projections, and thus $C^\ast(u) \cong M_2(\mathbb C)$. Let $y= |x| + |x^\ast|$ (which is the sum of two orthogonal positive elements, so $\|y\|=1$). Then $yu = uy$ and $u^\ast y =y u^\ast$ and thus there is a unique $\ast$-homomorphism $\psi \colon C_0((0,1]) \otimes M_2(\mathbb C) \to \mathcal B(H)$ such that $\psi(f\otimes e_{1,2}) = f(y) u$. The image of $\psi$ takes values in $A$ since $y^k u = y^{k-1} x \in A$, so $f(y)u \in A$ for any polynomial $f$ with trivial constant term. Let $B = \psi(C_0((0,1])\otimes M_2(\mathbb C))$ (which is equal to $C^\ast(x)$ but this is irrelevant) and $J = \psi(C_0(0,1) \otimes M_2(\mathbb C))$. Then $B/J \cong M_2(\mathbb C)$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The crucial fact here is of course that any "non-commutative [...] [$C^\ast$-algebra] $A$ contains a $C^\ast$-subalgebra which surjects onto $M_2(\mathbb C)$". Can you give a reference to this fact? $\endgroup$ Dec 3, 2022 at 22:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The closest thing I could find is 2.12.21 in Dixmier's $C^*$-book (which he attributes to unpublished by Kadison). Here it says that a $C^*$-algebra contains a non-zero nilpotent element if it is non-commutative (the converse is trivial). As the $C^*$-algebra generated by a nilpotent element of order 2 is a quotient of $C_0((0,1], M_2(\mathbb C))$ (by polar decomposition of the nilpotent element), it follows that it has a quotient isomorphic to $M_2(\mathbb C)$. $\endgroup$
    – Jamie Gabe
    Dec 4, 2022 at 10:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Zerox: First, I would say that $a>0$ means "positive and non-zero", so my examples are still valid. Second, you can simply replace my examples by $a+\delta 1$ and $b+\delta 1$ for sufficiently small $\delta$ if you want the spectrums contained in $(0,\infty)$ (since the set of positive semidefinite matrices is closed). $\endgroup$
    – Jamie Gabe
    Dec 4, 2022 at 12:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @IosifPinelis: If $x$ is nilpotent of order $n$, then $x^{n-1}$ is nilpotent of order 2, so if your algebra contains a nilpotent element, it contains a nilpotent element of order 2. But let me add a (somewhat) detailed proof in my answer above. There's a limit to how many elementary details I can give without making the argument drown in minor details, so a lot of the steps will be easy exercises that anyone who knows elementary $C^*$-theory should be able to fill out. $\endgroup$
    – Jamie Gabe
    Dec 4, 2022 at 12:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ On the other hand, there does exist a Young-like inequality for complex matrices, see this wiki page or [T. Ando (1995). "Matrix Young Inequalities". In Huijsmans, C. B.; Kaashoek, M. A.; Luxemburg, W. A. J.; et al. (eds.). Operator Theory in Function Spaces and Banach Lattices. Springer. pp. 33–38.] $\endgroup$
    – Zerox
    Dec 4, 2022 at 13:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.