4
$\begingroup$

Let $(R,\mathfrak m,k)$ be a local complete intersection ring with $\mathfrak m^3=0\ne \mathfrak m^2$. As $0\ne \mathfrak m^2 \subseteq \text{soc}(R)$ and $R$ is Gorenstein, so we get $\mathfrak m^2 =\text{soc}(R)\cong k$.

Now according to the beginning of Section 3 in page 293 of https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4049(85)90016-7, it holds that $\dim_k (\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2)\le 2$. However, no proof or reference to a proof is given. I have seen the same statement appear in other places as well, but again without any proof. Could someone please outline a proof or provide a reference to a proof?

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The associated graded ring is also a complete intersection. Its Hilbert series is the product from $i=1,\dots,n$ of $(1-t^{d_i})/(1-t)$, where the $d_i$ are the degrees of the defining equations. In particular, the socle is in degree $\sum_i (d_i-1)$. So, if the socle is in degree $2$, then the Hilbert series is either $(1-t^3)/(1-t)$ or $(1+t)^2$. $\endgroup$ Nov 26, 2022 at 13:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr: thank you for your comment, but why is the associated graded ring also a complete intersection? I thought that local complete intersection rings whose associated graded rings are also Complete Intersections, are called "strict complete intersections" . Definitely hypersurfaces are strict complete intersections, but this can fail in codimension $2$ as mentioned in page 2 (after Theorem 1) of arxiv.org/abs/2104.10140. Are you saying that Artinian local complete intersection rings with $\mathfrak m^3=0$ are also strict complete intersections? $\endgroup$
    – feder
    Nov 28, 2022 at 8:49
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I misunderstood your notation. Is $k$ a coefficient field for $R$? $\endgroup$ Nov 28, 2022 at 11:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr: No no, $k$ is just the residue field of the local ring $R$ ..... but let me also ask: If $R$ is a local complete intersection with a coefficient field, then the associated graded ring is also complete Intersection? $\endgroup$
    – feder
    Nov 28, 2022 at 12:02

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I an writing this as an answer. It is indeed the case that the graded ring of a local Artinian complete intersection ring can fail to be a local Artinian complete intersection ring. Here is a direct argument instead.

By hypothesis, $R$ is a quotient $A/I$ of a complete local ring $(A,\mathfrak{n},k)$ that is regular, where $I$ is generated by an $A$-regular sequence in $\mathfrak{n}^2$. In particular, the induced $k$-linear map from $\mathfrak{n}/\mathfrak{n}^2$ to $\mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2$ is an isomorphism. Let $(x_1,\dots,x_d)$ be an ordered $d$-tuple of elements of $\mathfrak{n}$ that map to a $k$-basis for $\mathfrak{n}/\mathfrak{n}^2$.
Thus, the ideal $I$ is generated by a regular sequence of length $d$ inside $\mathfrak{n}^2$. Now consider the $d(d+1)/2$ $k$-linearly independent elements $x_ix_j\in \mathfrak{n}^2/\mathfrak{n}^3$. The $R$-module $\mathfrak{m}^2/\mathfrak{m}^3$ equals the quotient of the $A$-module $\mathfrak{n}^2/\mathfrak{n}^3$ by $I/(I\cap \mathfrak{n}^3)$. Also $I/(I\cap \mathfrak{n}^3)$ is a quotient of $I/I\cdot \mathfrak{n}$, which is a $k$-vector space of dimension $d$. Thus, the $k$-vector space dimension of $\mathfrak{m}^2/\mathfrak{m}^3$ is at least $d(d+1)/2 - d = d(d-1)/2$.

Thus, if the socle of $A$ is $\mathfrak{m}^2$, so that $\mathfrak{m}^2/\mathfrak{m}^3$ has $k$-vector space dimension equal to $1$, then either $d=1$ and $I\subset \mathfrak{n}^3$ or $d=2$ and $I\cap \mathfrak{n}^3$ equals $I\cdot \mathfrak{n}$, i.e., the $2$ minimal generators of $I$ are elements of $\mathfrak{n}^2$ whose images in $\mathfrak{n}^2/\mathfrak{n}^3$ are $k$-linearly independent.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.