Thanks to Jan Bohr answer and comment I edited this question.

Let $E$ be a vector bundle , $E^*$ the dual bundle and $D$ a density bundle. Denote by $\Gamma(E)$ the space of section of the bundle $E$.

By definition the a distribution $\omega$ in a vector bundle $E$ is $\omega \in\Gamma(E^*\otimes D)^\prime$ where $\Gamma(E^*\otimes D)^\prime$ is the topological dual of $\Gamma(E^*\otimes D)$.

Now in this paper Algebraic Structure of Classical Field Theory: Kinematics and Linearized Dynamics for Real Scalar Fields by Romeo Brunetti, Klaus Fredenhagen, Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro they define at page 14 the Gateaux derivative as $$F^K[\phi](\phi_1...,\phi_k)=\left<F^K[\phi],\phi_1\otimes...\otimes\phi_k\right>=\frac{d^k}{d\lambda_1...d\lambda_k }\left(\phi + \lambda_1\phi_1+...\lambda_k\phi_k\right)$$ where $<>$ denotes dual pairing and $\phi,\phi_1...,\phi_k \in\Gamma(E) $

Now they say that $F^K[\phi]$ is a distribuition . But $F^K[\phi]$ is not in $\Gamma(E^*\otimes D)^\prime$ how can it be a distribution?

Thanks to Jan Bohr answer and comment I add this part . In this paper Properties of field functionals and characterization of local functionals by Christian Brouder, Nguyen Viet Dang, Camille Laurent-Gengoux, Kasia Rejzner at page 10

they define $F^K[\phi]$ as a d distributional section on $M^k$ for a general vector bundle.

Maybe they are using $<>$ to identify $E$ with $E^*$ but I am not sure


1 Answer 1


Consider the following example: $M$ is a closed manifold, $\mu$ is a volume form and $F\colon C^\infty(M)\rightarrow \mathbb C$ is defined by $F(\varphi)=\int_M\varphi^2\mu$. Then $F(\varphi+\lambda\varphi_1)=F(\varphi)+2\lambda\int_M(\varphi\varphi_1)\mu+\lambda^2F(\varphi_1)$. Taking the $\lambda$-derivative at $0$, you obtain $$ dF_\varphi(\varphi_1) =\int_M\varphi_1 (2\varphi\mu). $$ For fixed $\varphi$ you can interpret this as the linear functional on $C^\infty(M)$ that takes some $\varphi_1$ and sends it to the integral agains the form $2\varphi\mu$. If we define $\mathcal D'(M)$ as the continuous dual of $C^\infty(M)$, we have all right to call $dF_\varphi$ a distribution. As you mentioned, sometimes $\mathcal D'(M)$ is defined as the dual of $\Gamma(M,D)$, which is convenient if one does not want to fix a particular density. However, once a volume density is chosen (e.g. $\vert \mu \vert$), there is an isomorphism $C^\infty(M)\rightarrow \Gamma(M,D)$ given by $\psi\mapsto \psi \vert \mu \vert$. Hence also the dual spaces are isomorphic and you can consider $dF_\varphi$ as a distribution also in the other sense.

The authors write $dF_\varphi(\varphi_1)$ as $F^{(1)}[\varphi](\varphi_1)$ and then also consider higher order derivatives $F^{(k)}[\varphi](\varphi_1,\dots,\varphi_k)$. Again for fixed $\varphi$ you can view this as a linear functional on the algebraic tensor product $C^\infty(M)\otimes \dots \otimes C^\infty(M)$ ($k$-times). After choosing the correct topological tensor product, this should extend to a continuous linear functional on $C^\infty(M\times\dots\times M)$ and hence a distribution on $M^k$.

  • $\begingroup$ my problem is that $ F^K[\phi] \in \Gamma(E^*\otimes D)^\prime $ but in your anser you are considering $ F^K[\phi] \in \Gamma(E\otimes D)^\prime $ $\endgroup$ Nov 26, 2022 at 14:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Which vector bundle $E$ would you like to consider? In my example (and I believe also in the paper you linked), the vector bundle is trivial. $\endgroup$
    – Jan Bohr
    Nov 26, 2022 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ I would like to consider a vector bundle in general $\endgroup$ Nov 26, 2022 at 15:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.