4
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathscr{C}$ be a rigid $C^*$-tensor category. Let $\operatorname{Vec}(\mathscr{C})$ be the category with linear functors $\mathscr{C}^{\text{op}}\to \operatorname{Vec}$ (= category of complex vector spaces) as objects and with natural transformations between these functors as morphisms. This is a monoidal category, see section 2.4 in the article "Operator algebras in rigid C*-tensor categories" by Jones and Penneys.

In this same article, the following is claimed: enter image description here

I'm now trying to verify this claim. In neither direction, I see how this correspondence should work. So concretely, given an algebra object in $\operatorname{Vec}(\mathscr{C})$, how to associate a lax tensor functor $\mathscr{C}^{\text{op}}\to \operatorname{Vec}$ and conversely?

Thanks in advance for your help!

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

This is a special case of the well known result in (enriched) category theory which I believe goes back to Day, for example see Proposition 3.4 of https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Day+convolution#Monoids. The enriching category V utilized in the paper you reference is the symmetric monoidal category of vector spaces.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ It would nice to make your answer more self contained by stating the result, and perhaps describing the functors that the link shows to be equivalences. $\endgroup$ Nov 26 at 21:07
2
$\begingroup$

A somewhat more explicit answer. Details are still to be filled in, but at least you get an idea how to go from one to the other:


If $\mathbf{A}$ is an algebra object in $\operatorname{Vec}(\mathcal{C})$, then we have for every object $c$ maps $$\bigoplus_{a,b} \mathbf{A}(a)\otimes \mathcal{C}(c, a\otimes b)\otimes \mathbf{A}(b) \to \mathbf{A}(c)$$ where the direct sum ranges over simple objects. Taking $x,y$ simple, we consider the composition $$\mathbf{A}(x)\otimes \mathbf{A}(y)\hookrightarrow \bigoplus_{a,b} \mathbf{A}(a)\otimes \mathcal{C}(x\otimes y, a\otimes b)\otimes \mathbf{A}(b) \to \mathbf{A}(x\otimes y).$$ This gives us morphisms $\mathbf{A}(x)\otimes \mathbf{A}(y)\to \mathbf{A}(x\otimes y)$. There is a unique natural transformation between the bilinear functors $\otimes \circ (\mathbf{A}\times \mathbf{A})\to \mathbf{A}\circ \otimes$ with these values on the simple objects. This gives the desired Lax-tensor structure.


Conversely, if $\mathbf{A}: \mathcal{C}^{\text{op}}\to \operatorname{Vec}$ is a lax functor, with maps $\mathbf{A}(x)\otimes \mathbf{A}(y)\to \mathbf{A}(x\otimes y)$, consider the composition $$\bigoplus_{a,b}\mathbf{A}(a)\otimes \mathcal{C}(c, a\otimes b)\otimes \mathbf{A}(b) \cong \bigoplus_{a,b}\mathbf{A}(a\otimes b) \otimes \mathcal{C}(c,a\otimes b) \to \mathbf{A}(c)$$ which gives maps $(\mathbf{A}\otimes \mathbf{A})(c)\to \mathbf{A}(c)$ which induce the multiplication $\mathbf{A}\otimes \mathbf{A} \implies\mathbf{A}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.