Complex Analysis applications toward Number Theory I'm an undergrad who is taking a Complex Analysis Course mainly for its applications in number theory. 
So I would like to ask some guidelines about which theorems/concepts should I focus on in order to develop a narrower path for self study. 
In addition, it would be helpful to know if there is a book that does a good job showing off how the 
complex analysis machinery can be used effectively in number theory, 
or at least one with a good amount of well-developed examples in order to provide a wide background of the tools that complex analysis gives in number theory.
 A: I'll second Pete Clark's answer, and note that there are some other big theorems in analytic number theory for which there are proofs using Complex analysis. For example, there is the asymptotic formula for the number of partitions of $n$, which formula is ${e^{\pi\sqrt{2n/3}}\over4\sqrt3n}$. There is a proof in Donald J Newman, Analytic Number Theory, but be warned that the chapter on the partition function is infested with typos. 
A: And in transcendence theory. The proofs of the Hermite-Lindemann-Weierstrauss Theorem (special case: if $\alpha \neq 0$ is algebraic, then $e^\alpha$ is transcendental) and of the Gelfand-Schneider theorem (special case: if $\alpha\not\in\{0,1\}$ is algebraic, $\beta$ is algebraic and irrational, then $\alpha^\beta$ is transcendental) make fundamental and elegant use of complex analysis.
A: Complex analysis is often used in analytic number theory as a tool  to evaluate or estimate sums  $\sum a_n $ by studying the analytic behaviour (like existence of poles or how fast it grows) of the associated Dirichlet series $\sum a_n n^{-s}$. So for most interesting arithmetical functions (like a_n = number of divisors of n, say), one can study the corresponding Dirichlet series (possibly factor it as a product of various $L$-functions) to obtain information about the sum. One uses the Perron formula or Mellin inversion formula to pass from the sum to a contour integral. Davenport's book is the canonical reference.
A: This question is like asking how abstract algebra is useful in number theory: lots of it is used in certain areas of the subject so there's no tidy answer.  You probably won't be using Morera's theorem directly in number theory, but most of single-variable complex analysis is needed if you want to understand basic ideas in analytic number theory. A few topics you should pay attention to are: the residue theorem, the argument principle, the maximum modulus principle, infinite product factorizations (esp. the Hadamard factorization theorem), the Fourier transform and Fourier inversion, the Gamma function (know its poles and their residues), and elliptic functions. Basically pay attention to the whole course! There really isn't a whole lot in a first course on complex variables where one can say "that you should ignore if you are interested in number theory".
If you want to be careful and not just wave your hands, you need to know conditions that guarantee the convergence of series and products of analytic functions (and that the limit is analytic), the existence of a logarithm of an analytic function (it's not the composite of the three letters "log" and your function), that let you reorder terms in series and products, that justify termwise integration, and of course the workhorse of analysis: how to make good estimates.
A: I think basic is on the right track.  The two big classical theorems in analytic number theory whose classical proofs use some complex analysis are Dirichlet's Theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions and the Prime Number Theorem.  (It is also useful to learn about the combination of the two: the Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions.)
For the former, I can recommend my own lecture notes:
http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete/4400dirichlet.pdf
http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete/4400DT.pdf
The second part is explicitly a digested version of the proof Serre presents in his Course in Arithmetic.  I don't have a similarly canonical reference to give you for the proof of the Prime Number Theorem (i.e., I don't have any notes on it!), but it can be found in many analytic number theory books, for instance in Apostol's Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, Davenport's Multiplicative Number Theory or G.J.O. Jameson's The Prime Number Theorem.
