0
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a compact Lie group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}.$ Denote by $\mathfrak{g}^*$ the dual space of $\mathfrak{g}$. Let $r$ be an element of $\mathfrak{g}^*$ such that $G_r$ the stabilizer of $r$ under the coadjoint action is a maximal torus of $G$. Denote by $\mathcal{O}_r$ the coadjoint orbit of $G$ which pass through $r$.

$\mathcal{O}_r$ is endowed with a 2-form which is a symplectic form $$\omega_\alpha(\hat{X},\hat{Y})= -\alpha([X,Y]), \alpha \in \mathfrak{g}^*, \quad X,Y, \in \mathfrak{g}. $$ Often it is more convenient to choose an inner product $\langle . , . \rangle$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ to identify $\mathfrak{g}^*$ with $\mathfrak{g}$. Once such an inner product has been chosen, we can write the 2-form as $$\omega_\lambda(\hat{X},\hat{Y}) = −\langle \lambda, [X,Y] \rangle, \lambda, X, Y \in \mathfrak{g}.$$

If $G$ is semisimple, then we choose the killing form denoted $k$ to define $\omega$: $$\omega_\lambda(\hat{X},\hat{Y}) = −k(\lambda, [X,Y]).$$

$\textbf{Question}$: In the case where $G$ is a compact connected Lie group (not necessarily semisimple), why does the 2-form $$\omega_\lambda(\hat{X},\hat{Y}) = −k(\lambda, [X,Y]), \lambda, X, Y \in \mathfrak{g}.$$ defined using the killing form defines a symplectic form on thecoadjoint orbit $ \mathcal{O_r}$ of $G$ ?

Ps: This question appeared under bounty for 100 points here https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4563148/symplectic-form-of-a-coadjoint-orbit-of-a-compact-connected-lie-group but didn't receive any answer so far.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please explain the notations $\hat X$ and $\hat Y$? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 18:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The first formula $$\omega_\alpha(\hat{X},\hat{Y})= -\alpha([X,Y]), \alpha \in \mathfrak{g}^*, \quad X,Y, \in \mathfrak{g}.$$ is not clear. What is the relation between $X$ and $\hat X$? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 18:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you indeed want to get an answer, please try to explain your notation.... $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 19:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I will type an answer tomorrow or on Tuesday. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 20:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For today: Write $\frak g=\frak z \oplus \frak s$, $\frak g^*=\frak z^* \oplus \frak s^*$, where $\frak z$ is the center of $\frak g$, and $\frak s=[\frak g,\frak g]$ is the derived Lie algebra. Then the natural projection $\frak g^* \to \frak s^*$ induces an isomorphism of the symplectic varieties $G\cdot r$ and $G^{\rm ad}\cdot r_{\frak s}$ and preserves the Killing form. Here $G^{\rm ad}=G/Z(G)$ , and $r_{\frak s}$ denotes the projection of $r$ to $\frak s^*$. Note that ${\frak s}={\rm Lie}\,G^{\rm ad}$ is a semisimple Lie algebra. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 20:13

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator{\Tr}{Tr} \DeclareMathOperator{\ad}{ad} \DeclareMathOperator{\Lie}{Lie} \newcommand{\g}{{\mathfrak g}} \newcommand{\z}{{\mathfrak z}} \newcommand{\s}{{\mathfrak s}} \newcommand{\O}{{\mathcal O}} \newcommand{\wh}{\widehat} \newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}$ Let $G$ be a connected compact Lie group, and let $\g$ denote its Lie algebra. Write $\z$ for the center of $\g$ and set $\s=[\g,\g]$, which is a semisimple Lie algebra. Then $$ \g=\z\oplus\s.$$

Write $Z=Z(G)^0$ (the identity component of the center of $G$), $\ \wt S=[G,G]$, $S=G/Z(G)$. Then $Z$ is a torus, whereas $\wt S$ and $S$ are semisimple Lie groups. We can identify $$ \z=\Lie Z,\quad \Lie S=\s=\Lie\wt S.$$

The group $G$ acts on $\g$ by adjoint representation. Moreover, $G$ acts on $\g$ via the canonical surjective homomorphism $\pi\colon G\to S$. We write $$ g\cdot X=s\cdot X,\quad\text{where} \ g\in G,\ s=\pi(g)\in S,\ X\in\g.$$

We write an element $X\in \g$ as $$ X=X_\z+X_\s\ \quad \text{with}\ X_\z\in\z,\ X_\s\in \s\,.$$ Then $$g\cdot X=X_\z+g\cdot X_\s=X_\z+s\cdot X_\s\,.$$

Let $\g^*$ denote the dual space for $\g$. Then $$\g^*=\z^*\oplus \s^*.$$ For $r\in \g^*$ we may write $$r=r_\z+r_\s\quad\text{with}\ r_\z\in\z^*, \ r_\s\in \s^*.$$ Then for $g\in G$ we have $$g\cdot r=r_\z+g\cdot r_\s=r_\z+s\cdot r_\s\,.$$

Let $X\in\g$, $\ X=X_\z+X_\s\,$. Then $[X_\z\,,X_\s]=0$. It follows that $$\exp -tX=(\exp -tX_\z)\cdot( \exp -tX_\s) \quad\text{with}\ \exp -tX_\z\in Z,\ \exp -tX_\s\in\wt S,$$ whence $$(\exp -tX)\cdot \alpha=\alpha_\z+(\exp-t X_\s)\cdot \alpha_\s\quad \text{for}\ \alpha=\alpha_\z+\alpha_\s\in \g^*.$$ Write $$ \wh X=\frac d{dt}\Big|_{t=0}(\exp -tX)\cdot \alpha.$$ Then $\wh X=\wh{X_\s}$, where $$ \wh {X_\s}=\frac d{dt}\Big|_{t=0}(\exp -tX_\s)\cdot \alpha_\s.$$

For $r=r_\z+r_\z \in\g^*$ write $\O_r=G\cdot r$, $\ \O_{r_\s}=S\cdot r_\s\,$. Then $$ \O_r=r_\z+S\cdot r_\s=r_\z+\O_{r_\s}\,.$$ Thus for $\alpha=g\cdot r\in \O_r$ we have \begin{equation}\label{e:*} T_\alpha(\O_r)\cong T_{\alpha_\s}(\O_{r_\s}).\tag{$*$} \end{equation}

Consider the adjoint representation $$\ad\colon \g\to\mathfrak{gl}(\g),\quad (\ad X)\cdot Y=[X,Y].$$ For $X=X_\z+X_\s\in\g$ we have $\ad X=\ad X_\s\,$.

Consider the Killing form $$ k\colon \g\times\g\to{\mathbb R}, \quad (X,Y)\mapsto \Tr\!\big ((\ad X)\cdot (\ad Y)\big).$$ Then $$ k(X,Y)=\Tr\!\big ((\ad X_\s)\cdot (\ad Y_\s)\big)=k(X_\s\,,Y_\s).$$

For $\lambda \in\g$, we define a skew-symmetric form on $T_\alpha(\O_r)$ by $$\omega_\lambda(\wh X,\wh Y)=-k(\lambda,[X,Y]).$$ Since $[X,Y]=[X_\s\,,Y_\s]$, for $\lambda=\lambda_\z+\lambda_\s$ we have $$\omega_\lambda(\wh X,\wh Y)=-k(\lambda,[X,Y]) =-k(\lambda_\s,[X_\s\,,Y_\s])=\omega_{\lambda_\s}(\wh{X_\s}\,, \wh{ Y_\s\, }\,).$$

We can identify the tangent spaces $T_\alpha(\O_r)$ and $T_{\alpha_\s}(\O_{r_\s})$ by \eqref{e:*}. Then the formula above is probably what you need.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks for your detailed answer @Mikhail Borovoi. $\endgroup$
    – Mira
    Commented Nov 9, 2022 at 22:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.