5
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\U}{\mathcal{U}}$ $\newcommand{\F}{\mathcal{F}}$ $\newcommand{\D}{\mathcal{D}}$ $\newcommand{\C}{\mathcal{C}}$ For any infinite $X \subseteq \omega$, we define: $$ \D_X := \{Y \in [\omega]^\omega : Y \subseteq X \vee Y \cap X = \emptyset\} $$ It's easy to see that $\D_X$ is a dense open subset of $([\omega]^\omega,\subseteq)$ for all infinite $X$. Now let $\cal{C} \subseteq \lbrack\omega\rbrack^\omega$ be a collection of infinite sets. Consider the following statement:

The statement $\mathsf{U}(\C)$ asserts that: If $\F$ is a filter on $\omega$ and $\F \cap \D_X \neq \emptyset$ for all $X \in \cal{C}$, then $\F$ is an ultrafilter.

It's easy to verify that that $\mathsf{U}([\omega]^\omega)$ is true. Let $\mathfrak{u}'$ be the least cardinal such that there exists some $\cal{C} \subseteq \lbrack\omega\rbrack^\omega$ which $|\C| = \mathfrak{u}'$ and $\mathsf{U}(\C)$ holds. Is it consistent that $\mathfrak{u}' < \frak{c}$?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In other words, is $\mathfrak u'$ the least cardinal $\mathfrak u$ such that the Stone–Čech compactification $\beta\mathbb N$ is embeddable in $\{0,1\}^\mathfrak u$? $\endgroup$
    – bof
    Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 8:55
  • $\begingroup$ I have trouble understanding "${\cal D}_X$ is a dense open subset of $[\omega]^\omega,\subseteq)$". Is the topology on $[\omega]^\omega$ you are considering derived from the product topology on $\omega^\omega$, where $\omega$ itself carries the discrete topology? And what is the ordering $\subseteq$ for in the context of topology? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 9:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DominicvanderZypen Here I mean that they are dense open as a subset of a partial order. Alternatively, it is dense open in the topology generated by basic open sets $\{Z \in [\omega]^\omega : Z \subseteq Y\}$ for all $Y$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 11:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @bof I'm not proficient in understanding ultrafilters from the topological perspective, so if your comment was a question I'm afraid I'm unable to answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 12:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DominicvanderZypen Let $(\mathbb{P},\leq)$ be a partial order. A subset $D \subseteq \mathbb{P}$ is dense if for all $p \in \mathbb{P}$, there exists some $q \in D$ such that $q \leq p$. $D$ is open if it is downward-closed, i.e. $p \in D \wedge q \leq p \implies q \in D$. This standard definition can be found in most introductory texts in set theory. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2022 at 19:07

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

No; $\mathfrak u'=\mathfrak c$.

To prove it, consider any $\mathcal C\subseteq[\omega]^\omega$ with cardinality $<\mathfrak c$. Working modulo finoite subsets of $\omega$ , and closing under (finitary) Boolean operations, we may assume that $\mathcal C$ is a Boolean subalgebra of $\mathcal P(\omega)/\text{fin}$, and of course a proper subalgebra because of the cardinality assumption. There are now two ways to finish the proof.

(1) Since the inclusion map $\mathcal C\to P(\omega)/\text{fin}$ is not surjective, its Stone dual (from $\beta\omega-\omega$ to the space of ultrafilters in $\mathcal C$) is not injective. So fix two distinct ultrafilters $U$ and $V$ on $\omega$ that have the same intersection with $\mathcal C$. Let $F=U\cap V$. For any $X\in\mathcal C$, either $X$ is in both $U$ and $V$ and therefore in $F$, or $\omega-X$ is in both $U$ and $V$ and therefore in $F$. Thus, $F$ meets $\mathcal D_X$. But, since $U$ and $V$ are distinct, $F$ is not an ultrafilter.

(2) Fix some $A\subseteq\omega$ not in $\mathcal C$. (I'm still tacitly working mod finite.) Let $$ I=\{X\in\mathcal C:A\cap X\in\mathcal C\}, $$ and note that $I$ is a proper ideal in $\mathcal C$. Let $F$ be an ultrafilter of $\mathcal C$ disjoint from $I$, and let $F'$ be the filter in $\mathcal P(\omega)/\text{fin}$ generated by $F$ (i.e., the upward closure of $F$ in $\mathcal P(\omega)/\text{fin}$). The fact that $F$ is ultra in $\mathcal C$ implies that $F'$ meets $\mathcal D_X$ for each $X\in\mathcal C$. On the other hand, the fact that $F$ extends $I$ implies that every set in $F$ meets both $A$ and $\omega-A$; therefore the same holds for every set in $F'$, and thus $F'$ is not an ultrafilter.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .