2
$\begingroup$

For the sake of simplicity, assume $f$ is a non-cm eigenform of weight $k$ on the group $\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{Z})$. Are there any known results or conjectures regarding any special values of the associated $L$-function $L(f, n)$ for any integers $n$ for weight $k > 2$? If so, what can be said about the rational factor appearing said special values? In the case of elliptic curve $L$-functions, BSD predicts the factor of $\#E(\mathbb{Q}_{\mathrm{tors}})^{2}$ appearing in the denominator for $L(E, 1)$. I'd like to know if something similar in the form of known results or conjectures exist for $L$-functions satisfying the criteria above. I do believe they are quite mysterious, and I have been rather curious about Ramanujan's $L$-function $L(\Delta, s)$ for $s = 11$ in particular. This is something I'm far from an expert in!

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Since the OP is interested in particular by $L(\Delta,11)$, the relevant theorems come into the framework of Deligne's theory of special points and special values, while Bloch-Kato would be for $s>11$. Here the theorems are due to Shimura and especially Manin, which for $\Delta$ (and for general eigenforms similarly) states the following: set $r_j=(-2i\pi)^{-j-1}j!L(\Delta,j+1)$.

There exist real numbers $\omega^+$ and $\omega^-$ such that $$(r_1,r_3,r_5,r_7,r_9)=(48,-25,20,-25,48)\omega^-$$ $$(r_0,r_2,r_4,r_6,r_8,r_{10})=(22680/691,-14,9,-9,14,-22680/691)\omega^+i$$ $$\omega^-\omega^+=(4096/691)<\Delta,\Delta>$$

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Any good book on modular forms should have this, including my own with F. Str\"omberg. Just a comment: the results for $r_1$ up to $r_9$, exactly those without $691$, are quite easy and I believe due to Eichler (not Shimura). The result for $\omega^-\omega^+$ is also easy, standard Rankin--Selberg. The more subtle result for $r_0$ and $r_{10}$ is due to Manin. $\endgroup$ Oct 28, 2022 at 18:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ typo: replace Eichler (not Shimura) by Eichler--Shimura. $\endgroup$ Oct 28, 2022 at 19:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm afraid the claim "Bloch-Kato would be for s > 11" is incorrect here. The rational numbers $(48, -25, 20, \dots)$ etc aren't just random, and part of the Bloch--Kato conjecture is that for each prime $p$, the $p$-parts of these numbers are telling you something about the order of some $p$-adic Selmer group associated to $\Delta$. $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2022 at 12:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The general picture is that for a (non-zero) critical L-value, Deligne's conjectures tell you the special value up to $K^\times$ where $K$ is the coefficient field, but Bloch--Kato refines this to actually predict the special value up to a unit on $K$ (thus up to sign when $K = \mathbb{Q}$, as here). $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2022 at 12:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks David, I was not aware of this precise form of B-K. $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2022 at 20:34
4
$\begingroup$

For higher weight newforms, it seems that the conjecture you might want to look into is the Bloch-Kato conjecture. Here are a few links that might help you get started. The first is a survey article from 2003 (although a lot of progress has been made since then, this could be a good starting point):

https://jtnb.centre-mersenne.org/item/?id=JTNB_2003__15_1_179_0

Here is a fun paper on the distribution of zeros of certain polynomials (period polynomials) whose coefficients are built using the critical values you wish to study:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600569113

Here is a high-level overview that requires a bit of background in algebraic number theory, representation theory of finite groups, and group cohomology:

https://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/bellaiche.pdf

Here is a related Wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_values_of_L-functions

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a generally great answer, but the first of the two Wikipedia links is not relevant (that is about the "other" Bloch--Kato conjecture). $\endgroup$ Oct 28, 2022 at 12:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidLoeffler Thanks! I edited the answer accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – 2734364041
    Oct 28, 2022 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for responses $\endgroup$ Oct 28, 2022 at 17:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.