To discern whether two integral quadratic forms are equivalent over the $p$-adic integers, one can compute a Jordan decomposition at $p$ and read off some invariants. Restricting to $p\ne2$ for convenience, Conway and Sloane give an algorithm for this procedure (`$p$-adic diagonalisation'). But their algorithm in fact computes a diagonalisation over the localisation of $\mathbb{Z}$ at $p$, $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}:=\{\frac{a}{b}\text{ : }a,b\in\mathbb{Z},p\nmid b\}$, rather than over the $p$-adic integers $\mathbb{Z}_p$ in generality. My question is: does equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ differ from equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_p$? And if so, when do such differences occur?


1 Answer 1


Since $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ can be thought of as a subring of $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$, if two quadratic forms $Q_{1}$ and $Q_{2}$ are equivalent over $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$, then they must be equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$. (And this is the reason that it suffices for Conway and Sloane to compute a diagonalization over $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$.)

However, the converse is false. Equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$ does not imply equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ and maybe a good way of explaining this is that $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$ has a lot fewer square classes. In particular, if $p > 2$ and $x \in \mathbb{Z}_{p}$, then $x$ is a square if and only if $x = p^{2k} u$ for some integer $k \geq 0$ and $u \in \mathbb{Z}_{p}^{\times}$ whose reduction $\tilde{u} \in \mathbb{F}_{p}$ is a square.

In particular, the quadratic forms $Q_{1}(x,y) = x^{2} - y^{2}$ and $Q_{2}(x,y) = x^{2} - 7y^{2}$ are equivalent in $\mathbb{Z}_{3}$, but are not equivalent in $\mathbb{Z}_{(3)}$. This follows from the observation that $\sqrt{7} \in \mathbb{Z}_{3}$, while $\sqrt{7} \not\in \mathbb{Z}_{(3)}$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, great answer! Do you a know a reference for studying equivalence over the localisation? Do we have invariants that classify equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ in the same way we do for equivalence over $\mathbb{Z}_p$ (and genera of forms)? $\endgroup$
    – a196884
    Oct 27, 2022 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. Chapter 9 of O'Meara's book "Introduction to Quadratic Forms" is titled "Integral Theory of Quadratic Forms over Local Fields", and Theorem 92.2 of that book (page 247 in the second printing) gives a classification (in the non-dyadic cases) in terms of the discriminants of the terms in the Jordan splitting. (Basically, a term in the Jordan splitting arises from diagonalising the quadratic form and then grouping together all terms where the $p$-adic valuation of the coefficients are the same.) $\endgroup$ Oct 27, 2022 at 14:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.