5
$\begingroup$

First of the questions about derived algebraic geometry from a noobie.

The way I understand it, every discrete ring $R$ corresponds to some ring spectrum whose $\pi_0$ is $R$. Now consider $p$-adic numbers. They are a limit of discrete rings — what should correspond to them? How to generalize?

(+ what could be good tags for derived algebraic geometry? I was considering: e-infinity, infty-structures, math-0703204, derived-alggeom, derived-spaces, infty-topology, a-infinity-algebras (2 currently tagged))

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The word "spectrum" doesn't need infinity attached to it. Also, I recommend "derived-stuff" $\endgroup$
    – S. Carnahan
    Commented Oct 13, 2009 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ (Simpsons quote: Garbage goes to the garbage bin... Makes sense.) Derived-stuff it is. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 13, 2009 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ The E_\infty says that it has a highly structured multiplication lifting the multiplication on R - properly it's an E_\infty ring spectrum. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 15, 2009 at 15:55

4 Answers 4

10
$\begingroup$

There is indeed an Eilenberg-Maclane spectrum $H\Bbb Z_p$. It is equivalent to the $p$-completion of $H\Bbb Z$ and the (homotopy) limit of the $H\Bbb Z/p^k$. However, it doesn't remember the topology.

If you want to remember the topology on the p-adics you need to do something more complicated, such as view the inverse system $\{H\Bbb Z/p^k\}$ as a pro-object in spectra rather than actually taking the limit. This is something like what you would do if you wanted to talk about formal schemes.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

I would argue that looking for a ring spectrum is not the right thing to do. What you should be looking for is the category of modules over that possibly non-existent ring spectrum, as an infinity-category or just as a triangulated category. If you think about it this way, an obvious answer presents itself.

Begin with the category of $H\Bbb Z$-modules, or the derived category of $\Bbb Z$, or its infinity-category version. Now take the Bousfield localization with respect to the object $Fp$ (thought of as a complex in degree $0$). This is not a smashing localization, so this category is not equivalent to modules over $H\Bbb Z_p$ . As a triangulated category, it is compactly generated, but by $Fp$ itself. The sphere is not small. So this category is equivalent to modules over a DGA, the endomorphism DGA of $Fp$, but it is not commutative. It is more like a DG Hopf algebra, I suspect, so that its homotopy category has a tensor product even though it is not commutative. I have always thought this example needs more investigation, though it might be in Dwyer-Greenlees-Iyengar somewhere. It is a toy version of the $K(n)$-local stable homotopy category.

Mark

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

I don't know whether this actually helps answer your question, but Gereon Quick has done some work on profinite simplicial objects that may be relevant. You might want to poke around his papers a bit.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

There is a perfectly functional Eilenberg-Maclane spectrum $H\Bbb Z_p$, although it returns the discrete ring. It looks like you want a way to attach spectra to cohomology theories with topologized coefficient groups, and I don't know if that's possible (in particular the wedge axiom in Brown representability smells funny).

Random ideas that may or may not work:

  • Take a limit of Eilenberg-Maclane spectra $H\Bbb Z/p^n$
  • Take a $p$-completion of $H\Bbb Z$
$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Daniele, editing ten old questions in quick succession bumps ten newer questions off the front page. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 6, 2023 at 3:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GerryMyerson thanks for pointing this out. Also Yemon Choi in his comment warned me, so I stopped and read a couple of relevant meta post as suggested by him. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 6, 2023 at 4:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .