3
$\begingroup$

Can I express the expected value of \begin{equation} \langle \tau\rangle_\text{total}=\int_0^\infty \tau \psi_\text{inf}(\tau)\Psi_\text{rec}(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau \end{equation} in terms of the moment(s) of the two other distributions $\psi_\text{inf},\psi_\text{rec}$ where $\Psi_\text{rec}(\tau)$ is the survival function of the recover distribution. If not, is it at least possible to express: \begin{equation} I=\int_0^\infty \psi_\text{inf}(\tau)\Psi_\text{rec}(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau \end{equation} in terms of the moments of $ \psi_\text{rec}$ and $\psi_\text{inf}$?


Consider the following model: An infected individual will attempt to transmit the disease to a healthy neighbour at a random time whose distribution is $\psi_\text{inf}(\tau)$ such that $\langle \tau\rangle_\text{inf}$ is the expected time of transmission after initially contracting the disease. The probability that an individual stays infected for a duration $\tau$ without recovering and transmits the disease to the healthy neighbour in the next infinitesimal time interval $\mathrm{d}\tau$ is given by: \begin{equation} \psi_\text{total}(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau= \psi_\text{inf}(\tau)\Psi_\text{rec}(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau \end{equation}

Can I express the expected time of a successful transmission $\langle \tau\rangle_\text{total}$ in terms of the moments of the times of (attempted) infection and recovery: $\langle \tau\rangle_\text{inf},\langle \tau\rangle_\text{rec}$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
+100
$\begingroup$

I am not certain whether this is what you are looking for, but you could consider expanding $\Psi_{\sf rec}$ in power series (if it is regular enough) and the moments would emerge from this expansion. I am not sure you could find a much closer form given the quite general framework set in your question.

For example: If i) $\Psi_{{\sf rec}}$ is analytic about the origin; ii) $\langle \tau^i\rangle_{\sf inf}<\infty$ for all $i$; and iii) $$\sum_{i\geq 0}\frac{\left|\overset{(i)}{\Psi}_{{\sf rec}}(0)\right|}{i!}\langle\tau^i\rangle_{{\sf inf}}<\infty,$$ where $\overset{(i)}{\Psi}_{{\sf rec}}(0)$ is the $i$th derivative of $\Psi_{{\sf rec}}$ at the origin, then $$I=\sum_{i\geq 0}\frac{\overset{(i)}{\Psi}_{{\sf rec}}(0)}{i!}\int_0^{\infty} \psi_{{\sf inf}}(\tau) \tau^i d\tau=\sum_{i\geq 0}\frac{\overset{(i)}{\Psi}_{{\sf rec}}(0)}{i!}\langle\tau^i\rangle_{{\sf inf}}.$$

In the particular case where infections and healings are driven by Poisson processes -- i.e., once an individual is infected, it will attempt to transmit the infection after an exponentially distributed random time and the same for healing -- then, $\Psi_{\sf rec}(t)=e^{-t/\langle \tau\rangle_{\sf rec}}$ and $\psi_{\sf inf}(t)=e^{-t/\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf inf}}/\langle \tau\rangle_{\sf inf}$, and condition iii) above is fulfilled whenever $\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf inf}/\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}<1$. In this case, we have

$$I= \frac{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}}{\langle \tau \rangle_{\inf}+\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}},$$

as $\langle \tau^i\rangle_{\sf inf}=i!\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf inf}^i$ and

$$I=\sum_{i\geq 0}\overset{(i)}{\Psi}_{{\sf rec}}(0)\langle\tau\rangle_{{\sf inf}}^i=\sum_{i\geq 0} (-1)^i \left(\frac{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf inf}}{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}}\right)^i=\sum_{i\geq 0} \left(\frac{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf inf}}{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}}\right)^{2i}-\sum_{i\geq 0}\left(\frac{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf inf}}{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}}\right)^{2i+1}=\frac{\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}}{\langle \tau \rangle_{\inf}+\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf rec}}.$$

That is, for Poisson driven clocks, you only need the first moments.

In the same vain,

$$\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf total}=\sum_{i\geq 0}\frac{\overset{(i)}{\Psi}_{{\sf rec}}(0)}{i!}\langle\tau^{i+1}\rangle_{{\sf inf}}.$$

For the Poisson example, this reduces to

$$\langle \tau \rangle_{\sf total}=\frac{\lambda_{\sf inf}}{\left(\lambda_{\sf inf}+\lambda_{\sf rec}\right)^2}$$ where $\lambda_{\sf inf}:=1/\langle \tau\rangle_{\sf inf}$ and $\lambda_{\sf rec}:=1/\langle \tau\rangle_{\sf rec}$.

I believe that there are more relaxed conditions than the sufficient ones I cooked up now, namely, i), ii) and iii).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.