1
$\begingroup$

The theory of theta functions can be interpreted as automorphic representations on metaplectic groups (2-fold covering groups of $\mathrm{Sp}_{2}$, or $\mathrm{GL}_2$), and there's also a notion of $n$-fold covering groups which are studied by Brylinski-Deligne, Kubota, Weissman, and many people. Patterson and Bump-Hoffstein constructed cubic analogue of theta functions, i.e. automorphic forms on 3-fold covering groups of $\mathrm{GL}(2)$ and $\mathrm{GL}(3)$.

Since $n$-fold coverings of $G$ are extensions $1 \to \mu_n \to \tilde{G} \to G \to 1$, it seems possible to replace $\mu_n$ with other abelian groups. However, I never saw such an example in the context of automorphic forms and representations. My first thought was that half-integral weight Hilbert modular forms, whose weight is a tuple of half-integers, might be able to interpreted as automorphic forms on such covering groups. However, I realized that they aren't - Hilbert modular forms can be interpreted as automorphic forms on $\mathrm{GL}_{2}$ over real quadratic fields, so that half-integral weight Hilbert modular forms (seem to) correspond to automorphic forms on 2-fold covering groups of $\mathrm{GL}_{2}$ over a real quadratic field.

So my question is: is there any non-trivial and non-cyclic covering groups of a (well-known) reductive group? If there is, what are the corresponding automorphic forms and representations on it?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Let $\tilde{G}$ be a central extension of $G$ by a finite group $A$. Let $V$ be a complex representation of $G$. Then $V$ decomposes as a direct sum over all characters $\chi:A\to \mathbb{C}^\times$. $$ V=\bigoplus_{\chi} V_\chi, $$ where $$ V_\chi = \{v\in V \mid av=\chi(a)v \ \ \ \forall\ a\in A\}.$$

The action of $\tilde{G}$ on any $V_\chi$ factors through a central extension of $G$ by a finite cyclic group. So from this point of view, we don't lose any phenomena when restricting our attention to central extensions by cyclic groups.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Using, just to say it explicitly, the fact that $\chi(A)$ is a finite, hence cyclic, subgroup of $\mathbb C^\times$. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Oct 20, 2022 at 1:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.