6
$\begingroup$

Consider the surface $S_{\epsilon}$ defined as: \begin{align} %S&=\{\vec x \in \mathbf{R}^3: x=0\}, \\ S_{\epsilon}&=\{\vec x \in \mathbf{R}^3:f_{\epsilon}(\vec x)\equiv\epsilon ((x^2 + y^2 - 4)^2 + z^2 - 1) + x=0\}. \end{align} The topology of $S_{\epsilon}$ is $\mathbf S^2$ when $\epsilon$ is small but non-zero, and the topology of $S_0$ is $\mathbf{R}^2$. But I find this puzzling because I thought that the topology changes only when the constraining function, $f_{\epsilon}(\vec x)$, has a critical point (i.e. $\vec\nabla f_\epsilon=0$ at some point on the surface).

However as $\epsilon\to0$, $f_\epsilon$ never has a critical point, yet the topology is changed. Can someone explain this?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The above def. of $\ S_\epsilon\ $ is a mess to me. $\endgroup$
    – Wlod AA
    Sep 26, 2022 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ @WlodAA $(x,y,z)$ are coordinates in $\mathbf R^3$ and $f_\epsilon(\vec x)=0$ defines a surface in $\mathbf R^3$. $\endgroup$
    – dennis
    Sep 27, 2022 at 11:26

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

The formal statement you are thinking of when you assert "The topology changes only when..." is Ehresmann's theorem: a proper smooth submersion is a fiber bundle, and hence all fibers are diffeomorphic. Here "proper" means that the inverse image of any compact set is compact. It is a useful fact that proper maps are closed; because the set of critical points is closed, it follows that under these assumptions the set of critical values are also closed.

Thus if $M$ is some noncompact manifold and $f: M \to N$ is a proper smooth function for which $n_0$ is not a critical value, then neither is any $n \in U$ in a neighborhood around $n_0$, and $f^{-1}(U) \to U$ defines a proper smooth submersion. Ehresmann's theorem now asserts that $f^{-1}(n_0)$ is diffeomorphic to any $f^{-1}(n)$ with $t \in U$.

If I were to attempt to apply Ehressman's theorem here, I would define a function $F: \Bbb R^4 \to \Bbb R^2$ by $F(\vec x, \epsilon) = (f_\epsilon(\vec x), \epsilon)$ and consider $F^{-1}(0,\epsilon)$ as $\epsilon$ changes. As you say $F$ is a submersion. But the function $F$ is not proper, because $F^{-1}(0,0)$ is not compact. So I cannot apply Ehressman.

I do not know any particularly powerful theorem which asserts something like you want without the properness assumption, so it is not surprising that you see different preimages have different topological type.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So transitions between compact manifolds must pass through a critical point but not transitions involving a non-compact mfd? $\endgroup$
    – dennis
    Sep 27, 2022 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, as you see in your example. $\endgroup$
    – mme
    Sep 27, 2022 at 13:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.