Let $$ H_\lambda=-\frac{d^2}{dx^2}+\lambda^2 x^2,\quad\lambda>0. $$ It is known that the spectrum of $H_\lambda$ is the set $\{(2n-1)\lambda,n\in \Bbb N^*\}$. Now put $$ (U_\mu \phi)(x)= e^{\mu\over 2}\phi (e^{\mu}x)\mu \in \Bbb R. $$ It is easy to check that $\{U_\mu,\mu\in\Bbb R\}$ forms a one-parameter unitary group and that $$ U_\mu H_1 U^{-1}_\mu = e^{-2\mu}\bigl( -\frac{d^2}{dx^2}+ e^{4\mu}x^2 \bigr) ,\quad\mu\in\Bbb R $$ and can be analytically continued into regions of complex $\mu$. Hence for $\lambda,\mu\in\Bbb C$, we have $$U_\mu (H_1-\lambda) U^{-1}_\mu = e^{-2\mu}\biggl( -\frac{d^2}{dx^2}+ e^{4\mu}x^2-\lambda e^{2\mu}\biggr).$$ This seems to imply that the spectrum of the operator $-\frac{d^2}{dx^2}+ e^{4\mu}x^2$, $\mu\in \Bbb C$ is the set $\{(2n-1)e^{2\mu},n\in \Bbb N^*\}$: is this result true? And if the answer is affirmative, how can we rigorously prove it?

@AlexandreEremenko. Here is the definition of the spectrum Let $T$ be a closed linear operator from a complex Banach space $X$ into $X$ with dense domain $D(T)$. Then the resolvent set $\rho(T)$ of $T$ is defined to be the set of all complex numbers $\lambda$ for which $T-\lambda I: D(T)\to X$ is bijective and $(T-\lambda I)^{-1}:X\to D(T)$ is a bounded operator, where $I$ is the identity operator on $X$. The spectrum $\sigma (T)$ is simply the complement of $\rho(T)$ in $\Bbb C$.

the point spectrum $\sigma_p (T)$ of $T$ is the set of all complex numbers $\lambda$ such that $T-\lambda I$ is not injective. The continuous spectrum $\sigma_c (T)$ of $T$ is the set of all complex numbers $\lambda$ such that the range $R(T-\lambda I) $ of $(T-\lambda I)$ is dense in $X, (T-\lambda I)^{-1}$ exists, but is unbounded. The residual spectrum $\sigma_r (T)$ of $T$ is the set of all complex numbers $\lambda$ such that $(T-\lambda I)^{-1}$ is bounded, but the range $ R(T-\lambda I)$ is not dense in $X$. It is easy to see that $\sigma_p (T), \sigma_c (T)$ and $\sigma_r (T)$ are mutually disjoints and

$$ \sigma(T)=\sigma_p (T)\sqcup \sigma_c (T)\sqcup \sigma_r (T) .$$

  • $\begingroup$ The answer depends on what do you exactly mean by "the spectrum". For complex $\mu$ your operator may not have any eigenvalues in $L^2(R)$. $\endgroup$ Sep 25 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexandreEremenko. See above the definition $\endgroup$ Sep 25 at 19:17
  • $\begingroup$ You have to define what $D(T)$ is, and on which space does your operator act. $\endgroup$ Sep 25 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ It's domain is given by $D_\lambda=\{u \in L^2(\Bbb R): H_\lambda u \in L^2(\Bbb R)\}$ $\endgroup$ Sep 25 at 21:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ MR1204365 Bender, Carl M., Turbiner, Alexander Analytic continuation of eigenvalue problems. Phys. Lett. A 173 (1993), no. 6, 442–446. $\endgroup$ Sep 26 at 19:28

1 Answer 1


Indeed, this is the result of Davies - Pseudo-Spectra, the Harmonic Oscillator and Complex Resonances (1982): The resolvent operator $(H-zI)^{-1}$ of $$H=-d^2/dx^2+cx^2,\;\;\operatorname{Re}c>0,\;\; \operatorname{Im}c>0,$$ is compact for all $z$ not in the spectrum consisting of the set $\{(2n-1)\sqrt c,\;\;n=1,2,3,\dotsc\}$. The spectrum is referred to as a "pseudo-spectrum", because the associated eigenfunctions do not form a basis of the Hilbert space.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you a lot @Carlo Beenakker. My question is my proof is correct? $\endgroup$ Sep 25 at 19:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think so, with your definition of "spectrum". $\endgroup$ Sep 25 at 19:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.