8
$\begingroup$

Many geometries (Riemannian, symplectic, complex, Kähler, Calabi-Yau) can be defined as categories of G-structures on manifolds with the first integrability condition (zeroing of torsion of G-structure), and structure-preserving morphisms are defined naturally if $G \to GL_n$ is monomorphism. Is it possible to define contact geometry in such terms?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

A contact structure on $M^{2n+1}$ defines a $G$-structure (actually, it defines more than one, but there is a 'minimal' $G$-structure that is preserved by all contact transformations, and that is the one that people usually consider). Conversely, a $G$-structure on $M^{2n+1}$ comes from a contact structure provided that its intrinsic torsion satisfies the appropriate identities.

For example, a contact structure on $M$ is defined by a $2n$-plane field $D\subset TM$ (satisfying some nondegeneracy property). So if $G_0\subset\mathrm{GL}(2n{+}1,\mathbb{R})$ is the linear subgroup that preserves the subspace $\mathbb{R}^{2n}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n{+}1}$, then a contact structure defines a $G_0$-structure on $M$ and, conversely, that $G_0$-structure contains the information needed to recover $D$. In that sense, the $G_0$-structure and the $2n$-plane field $D$ are equivalent information.

However, you will note that not every $G_0$-structure on $M$ defines a contact structure, because the corresponding hyperplane field defined by $G_0$ might be integrable, say.

Meanwhile, via the Lie bracket, a contact structure $D\subset TM$ defines a linear bundle map $B:\Lambda^2(D)\to TM/D$ that is non-degenerate. Correspondingly, there is a subgroup $G_1\subset G_0$ that is the subgroup that preserves a non-degenerate mapping $b:\Lambda^2(\mathbb{R}^{2n})\to\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}/\mathbb{R}^{2n}$. Hence, a contact structure $D$ defines a canonical $G_1$-structure on $M$ in the obvious way. Conversely, a $G_1$-structure on $M$ whose associated induced mapping $B:\Lambda^2(D)\to TM/D$ coincides with the one induced by the Lie bracket on $M$ contains all the information in the contact structure and nothing else; automorphisms of the $G_1$-structure are exactly the contact transformations. (The condition that the $B$ associated to the $G_1$-structure coincide with the one induced by the Lie bracket is the analog of 'integrability' in this case. However, this is not the same as the $G_1$-structure being 'torsion-free'.)

Moreover, there is no proper subgroup $G_2\subset G_1$ for which contact transformations of $M$ preserve some $G_2$-structure on $M$. In this sense, the $G_1$-structure defined above is the 'minimal' $G$-structure defined by a contact structure.

For $n$ odd, the only proper subgroup $G\subset\mathrm{GL}(2n{+}1,\mathbb{R})$ such that the contact transformations of $\mathbb{R}^{2n{+}1}$ preserve a torsion-free $G$-structure is the index $2$ subgroup $G=\mathrm{GL}^+(2n{+}1,\mathbb{R})$ while, for $n$ even, there is no proper subgroup with this property.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.