3
$\begingroup$

For a smooth variety $X$ over $\mathbb{Q}_p$. is there always a scheme $Y$ over $\mathbb{Z}_p$ satisfying conditions (1) $Y \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}_p}\mathbb{Q}_p\simeq X$ (2) $Y$ is flat over $\mathbb{Z}_p$ and regular (3) the morphism $Y\to \text{Spec}~\mathbb{Z}_p$ is subjective ?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "subjective" = "surjective"? :) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2022 at 20:49

2 Answers 2

8
$\begingroup$

Yes, this follows from Nagata's compactification theorem in this generality as follows. If we consider the morphism $X \to \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$, there exists a proper scheme $\overline{Y} \to \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$ and an open immersion $X \subset \overline{Y}$ over $ \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$. When $X$ is quasi-projective, we can just take $\overline{Y}$ to be the closure inside $\mathbb{P}^n_{\mathbb{Z}_p}$. Up to replacing $\overline{Y}$ by its normalization, we can suppose that it is normal and thus regular in codimension $1$. Up to replacing $\overline{Y}$ with the closure of $X$, we can suppose that $X$ is a dense open. Thus $\overline{Y} \to \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$ is proper, every component of $\overline{Y}$ dominates $\operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$ and $\overline{Y}$ is reduced so we conclude that $\overline{Y} \to \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$ is flat and proper and in particular surjective.

By regularity in codimension $1$, we have a maximal open subset $U \subset \overline{Y}$ whose complement has codimension $2$ such that $U$ is regular and flat over $\mathbb{Z}_p$. By flatness, the fiber $\overline{Y}|_0$ over the closed point has codimension $1$ so $U \cap \overline{Y}|_0 \neq \emptyset$ and $U \to \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z}_p$ is surjective. Since $X$ is smooth, $X \subset U$. Let $Z = U_{\eta} \setminus X$ where $U_\eta$ is the generic fiber of $U$ and let $\overline{Z}$ be the closure of $Z$ in $U$. Finally, let $Y = U \setminus \overline{Z}$. Then $Y$ does the job.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

This is really a comment on Dori Bejleri's perfectly valid answer, to show how to bypass Nagata compactification.

Pick a nonempty affine open $U\subset X$. Then $U$ is the generic fiber of some affine $V$, surjective and flat over $\mathbb{Z}_p$ (this is easy). We may assume $V$ normal, and then observe (as Dori does) that the regular locus $W$ of $V$ is surjective over $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}_p)$, and has $U$ as generic fiber. Since $U$ is open in both $X$ and $W$, we can glue $X$ and $W$ along $U$ to get a scheme $Y$ as desired. Note that by construction, the closed fibers of $W$ and $Y$ coincide.

I suspect that the OP has omitted the (reasonable) requirement that $Y$ be separated. Let me show that the above $Y$ is (equivalently, that $Y\to\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}_p)$ is a separated morphism) , using the valuative criterion. So let $S\to\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}_p)$ be the spectrum of a valuation ring, with generic point $\eta$ and closed point $s$. Let $\alpha, \beta:S\rightrightarrows Y$ be two $\mathbb{Z}_p$-morphisms with the same restriction to $\eta$. Now we have two cases:

  • either $S$ sits above $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Q}_p)$ and then $\alpha$ and $\beta$ factor through $U$ which is separated, hence $\alpha=\beta$;
  • or $s$ is above $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{F}_p)$, and then $\alpha(s)$ and $\beta(s)$ are in the closed fiber of $Y$, wich is contained in $W$. This means that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ factor through $W$, because $S$ is local, and we conclude again that $\alpha=\beta$ because $W$ is separated.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.