3
$\begingroup$

Note: This is a refinement of a previous problem.

Let $f \in L^1 (\mathbb R)$. Suppose $g_n \in L^1 (\mathbb R)$ are a sequence of positive functions.

Define, for each $n$, the function $f_n$ by

$$f_n (x) := \frac{1}{2g_n (x)} \int_{x - g_n (x)}^{x + g_n (x)} f(y) \, dy.$$

Question: Is it true that if $g_n \to 0$ in $L^1$ strong, then $f_n \to f$ in weak $L^1$ norm?

Remarks:

Yuval Peres has shown in the linked post that the implication $g_n \to 0$ in $L^1$ $\Rightarrow$ $f_n \to f$ in $L^1$ does not generally hold.

In fact it is possible that none of the $f_n$ are even in $L^1$. As he points out, this is related to the fact that the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of $f$ is not in $L^1$, and one can capture the behaviour of the maximal function adequately.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

This is true, because we can approximate $f$ in $L^1$ by continuous functions. For them the statement clearly holds, and for the difference we can apply the classical Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality. Next, I will add some details.

Define the operator $T_n$ on functions in $L^1(\mathbb R)$ by $$(T_nf)(x) := \frac{1}{2g_n (x)} \int_{x - g_n (x)}^{x + g_n (x)} f(y) \, dy.$$

By [1], $T_n$ maps $L^1$ to functions with finite weak L^1 norm, see [2] for the definition.

Given $f \in L^1(\mathbb R)$ and $\epsilon>0$, there exists a continuous function $h$ with compact support, $h \in C_c(\mathbb R)$, such that $\|f-h\|_1<\epsilon.$ Let $\mu$ be Lebesgue measure. By [1], for all $\lambda>0$, $$\mu\{x \in \mathbb R: |T_n(f-h)(x)|>\lambda/2 \} \le \frac{2C_1 \epsilon}{\lambda} \,, \tag{1}$$ where $C_1$ is an absolute constant.

Since $h$ is uniformly continuous and $g_n \to 0$ in probability, the bounded convergence theorem gives that $\|T_n h-h\|_1 \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$. Thus for all $n>n_\epsilon$, we have $\|T_n h-h\|_1<\epsilon$, so $$\mu\{x \in \mathbb R: |T_n(h)(x)|>\lambda/2 \} \le \frac{2\epsilon} {\lambda}\,. \tag{2}$$

By (1) and (2), for all $n>n_\epsilon$, $$\mu\{x \in \mathbb R: |T_n(f)(x)|>\lambda \} \le \frac{(2+2C_1)\epsilon} {\lambda}\,,\tag{2}$$ as needed.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy%E2%80%93Littlewood_maximal_function

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lp_space#Weak_Lp

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Looking forward to it! $\endgroup$
    – Nate River
    Commented Jul 18, 2022 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ Just read the proof, very nice and similar to the proof of the original Lebesgue differentiation. $\endgroup$
    – Nate River
    Commented Jul 19, 2022 at 6:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .