7
$\begingroup$

This question is a sequel to Pointless groups, where I asked for a certain kind of counterexample. @DanielLitt produced an elegant and easy-to-understand counterexample, but also suggested a sense in which it might be the only counterexample.

At the suggestion of @R.vanDobbendeBruyn and @YCor, this question has yet another sequel: Pointless groups III.

Fix a field $k$ — not algebraically closed, and, in fact, this question is obviously of interest only if $k$ is finite. (EDIT: @R.vanDobbendeBruyn points out in the comments that my memory that the $k$-points are Zariski-dense in the infinite case is only guaranteed true for reductive groups, and gives a counterexample for an infinite, imperfect field.) Then "group" means "smooth, connected, affine algebraic group scheme of finite type over $k$".

If $G$ is a (smooth, connected) group, and $G(k)$ is trivial, then does that imply that $k = \mathbb F_2$ and $G$ is a split torus?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is this only of interest for $k$ finite? Elliptic curves can have trivial group of $k$-points over infinite fields (e.g. number fields). There is a result that $G$ is unirational (hence $G(k) \subseteq G$ is dense) if $G$ is a smooth, connected, affine algebraic group over $k$ and either $G$ is reductive or $k$ is perfect, but this is far from obvious. What about the remaining cases (e.g. pseudoreductive groups over imperfect fields)? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 10, 2022 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ @R.vanDobbendeBruyn, re, as specified, I am only considering affine algebraic groups, although I would certainly be interested in any interesting comments you have about the non-affine case. In the smooth, connected, affine algebraic case, $G(k)$ is dense in $G$ once $k$ is infinite (isn't it? I always get these hypotheses mixed up. At least it is so when $k$ is separably closed, even if imperfect). $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jun 10, 2022 at 23:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ah, in fact Conrad–Gabber–Prasad construct a smooth connected $1$-dimensional pseudo-reductive group $G$ over $k = \mathbf F_p(t)$ for $p > 2$ with $G(k) = 0$; see Pseudo-reductive groups, Example 11.3.2. But all is well when you add "perfect" as assumption ― of course the question over finite fields is still interesting! $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 10, 2022 at 23:12
  • $\begingroup$ @R.vanDobbendeBruyn, thanks! Would you post that as an answer? And indeed I see that the result I was remembering that only required $k$ to be infinite was for $G$ reductive (although the result about density of $G(k)$ for $k$ separably closed is true even without that assumption). I am reluctant to change the question once more to require $k$ finite. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jun 10, 2022 at 23:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Indeed I'd like to see the case $k$ finite in another question (the case of $k$ not perfect doesn't sound surprising to me). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 11:00

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

One other type of example is constructed in Conrad–Gabber–Prasad's Pseudo-reductive groups, Example 11.3.2. The construction is kind of classic (and possibly predates the book), so let me recall it here:

Example. Let $k = \bar{\mathbf F}_p(t)$, and let $G \subseteq \mathbf G_a \times \mathbf G_a$ be the subgroup $$\left\{(x,y) \in \mathbf G_a \times \mathbf G_a\ \big|\ y^p = x-tx^p\right\}.$$ It is smooth and becomes isomorphic to $\mathbf G_a$ over $k(t^{1/p})$ (replace $y$ by $y+t^{1/p}x$ and eliminate $x$).

Lemma. If $p > 2$, then $G(k) = \{(0,0)\}$.

Proof. Let $(x,y) \in G(k)$. If $x = 0$, then $y = 0$ as well, so we may assume $x \neq 0$. Then $x$ cannot be a $p$-th power, for otherwise $t$ is a $p$-th power. Thus there exists $a \in \bar{\mathbf F}_p$ such that $v:=v_a(x)$ is not divisible by $p$. The equation $y^p = x-tx^p$ gives $$(y+ax)^p = x-(t-a)x^p.$$ The ultrametric triangle inequality implies that if $\alpha+\beta = \gamma$, then the set of valuations $\{v_a(\alpha),v_a(\beta),v_a(\gamma)\} \subseteq \mathbf Z \cup \{\infty\}$ has at most $2$ elements. Since $v_a((y+ax)^p)$ is divisible by $p$ but neither $v=v_a(x)$ nor $v_a((t-a)x^p)=pv+1$ is, we conclude that $v=pv+1$, i.e. $(p-1)v=-1$, which is impossible since $p > 2$ and $v \in \mathbf Z$. $\square$

For $p = 2$ there is also the point $(1/t,0)$, and again Conrad–Gabber–Prasad show that this is the only other point.

Remark. On the other hand, if $k$ is an infinite field and either $k$ is perfect or $G$ is reductive, then $G$ is unirational, hence $G(k) \subseteq G$ dense. See for instance Milne's notes, Corollaries 19.21 and 19.22. Thus, the only examples are among imperfect fields and finite fields.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The last fact ($G(k)$ Zariski-dense) is due to Rosenlicht. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ It's surprising to me to see one case where $p = 2$ isn't the worst-behaved prime! $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 14:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice maybe it secretly is ― I expect the same argument works if you replace by $tx^p$ by $tx^q$ for a power $q > 2$ of $p$ (e.g. $q=4$). $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 14:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .