I have read Peter Johnstone's “The Point of Pointless Topology” and the idea that topological spaces are not quite the right abstraction for topology seems, at least philosophically, rather appealing. Certainly, however, to convince any topologist of its use one would need to provide analogues to basic concrete objects and constructions used in general topology.
I am looking for references which transcribe the following notions (or others with the same concrete flavour) in the category of locales:
Homotopy and homotopy equivalence;
The fundamental group/groupoid;
Homology and cohomology;
$S^1$, $[0,1]$, $\mathbb R^n$;
Classical constructions such as $CX, \Sigma X, X \vee Y, \beta X$;
CW complexes.
Many thanks.