6
$\begingroup$

A Cartan-Hadamard 3-space $M$ is a complete simply connected 3-dimensional Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature. A (smooth) convex surface $\Gamma\subset M$ is an embedded topological sphere with nonnegative second fundamental form $\mathrm{I\!I}$. The total (Gauss-Kronecker) curvature of $\Gamma$ is defined as $$ \mathcal{G}(\Gamma):=\int_\Gamma\det(\mathrm{I\!I}). $$ It follows quickly from Gauss' equation and Gauss-Bonnet theorem that $\mathcal{G}(\Gamma)\geq 4\pi$. Suppose that $\mathcal{G}(\Gamma)= 4\pi$. Does it follow that the compact region of $M$ bounded by $\Gamma$ is Euclidean, i.e., all its sectional curvatures are zero?

Note 1: Schroeder and Strake showed in this paper (see Theorem 2) that the answer is yes, provided that $\Gamma$ is strictly convex, i.e., the second fundamental form is positive definite. Strict convexity appears to be an essential feature of the proof.

Note 2: On page 66 of Lectures on Manifolds on Nonpositive Curvature (see Exercise (b)), Gromov poses a more general question for total absolute curvature of closed surfaces in Cartan-Hadamard $3$-spaces (the term "absolute" is not explicitly mentioned).

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Note that curvature in sectional directions tangent to the surface, say $\Sigma$ vanish. It seems sufficient to conclude that the usual Peterson–Codazzi equations hold for the surface. It follows that there is a convex surface $\Sigma'$ in the Euclidian space that is isometric to $\Sigma$; plus they have identical second fundamental forms.

Now we want to use bow lemma (diffgeometric analog of arm lemma). The bow lemma has a version for Hadamard spaces. Applying it to plane arcs in $\Sigma'$, we get that the map $\Sigma'\to\Sigma$ is distance-noncontracting.

Applying Reshetnyak majorization theorem, to plane sections of $\Sigma'$, we get that the map $\Sigma'\to\Sigma$ is distance-preserving.

Finally, applying Kirszbraun, we get that the map $\Sigma'\to\Sigma$ extends to a distance-preserving map from the convex hull of $\Sigma'$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In fact, one does not need Peterson–Codazzi, it is sufficient to see that curvature transformation $R(X,Y)$ vanish for tangent vectors $X$ and $Y$ to the surface. It implies that there is a parallel frame on the surface that gives the needed embedding into Euclidean space. This way you get the result in all dimesnions. $\endgroup$ Jun 30, 2022 at 19:36
1
$\begingroup$

The following paper develops the outline described by Anton Petrunin to solve Gromov's problem on total absolute curvature for simply connected surfaces:

Convexity and rigidity of hypersurfaces in Cartan-Hadamard manifolds

The main result of the paper generalizes Chern-Lashof characterization of convex hypersurfaces in Euclidean space, and rigidity theorem of Greene-Wu-Gromov for Cartan-Hadamard manifolds.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.