-1
$\begingroup$

It occurs to me that the question about whether non-trivial cycles exist for the collatz conjecture can be restated as these two questions (details on how this relates to the collatz conjecture can be found here):

  • Is there a general method for determining how many distinct values of $t_1, t_2, \dots, t_k$ exist for a given $k$ such that:

    • $t_k > t_{k-1} > \dots > t_2 > t_1 > 0$
    • $2\left(2^{t_k} - 3^k\right) < 3^{k-1} + \sum\limits_{i=1}^{k-1}3^{k-1-i}2^{t_i}$
  • Would it follow that as $k$ increases, the number of distinct values approaches infinity?

It seems to me that if the number of distinct values approaches infinity and distinct values have sufficient variability, then the collatz conjecture is most likely not true. If the number of distinct values has a finite limit, then the collatz conjecture may well be true.

Are there any well known papers that investigate the collatz conjecture from this viewpoint?

Intuitively, it seems to me that one of the following must be true:

  • there is only a finite number of distinct values of $3^{k-1} + \sum\limits_{i=1}^{k-1}3^{k-1-i}2^{t_i} > 2\left(2^{t_k} - 3^k\right)$
  • there is an infinite number of distinct values but all are relatively prime to $2^{t_k} - 3^k$
  • the collatz conjecture has at least one non-trivial cycle

Are there any well-known results that address this approach?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ im sure all of this has been explored before $\endgroup$ Commented May 26, 2022 at 19:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks. I'll delete if the question score stays negative and there is no answer. It was suggested that I post it here from MSE. I am trying to find out more information about what's been well explored. I just want to find the papers and start reading up. :-) $\endgroup$ Commented May 26, 2022 at 19:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Quite some time since I looked at it but I believe some details of that can be found in Lagarias’ work(and certainly those of others I can’t recall now). See for instance arxiv.org/pdf/math/0309224.pdf and maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Ford/… $\endgroup$
    – Jack L.
    Commented May 27, 2022 at 13:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hmm, didn't mention this here so far (why did I forget?) For the discussion in MSE I made a short exploration, put on my homepage, see go.helms-net.de/math/collatz/… for some heuristics and considerations. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 9, 2022 at 9:55

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Lagarias' bibliographies give some references from where you might search forward. For instance see this image This is from the year-2004 version; Lagarias updated this up to version 2011; the Lagarias bibliogrphies are downloadable from the net.


Update (7'22): Just found an old downloaded article

Maurice Margenstern and Yuri Matiyasevich   

Abstract:
We show how the 3 x + 1  conjecture can be expressed
in the language of arithmetical formulas with 
binomial coefficients.
e-mail: [email protected]   
e-mail: [email protected]      
URL: http://logic.pdmi.ras.ru/~yumat

This is of 1998; don't know whether the URL or the email is still working; maybe it is only tangential to your question, but thought it might be of interest from a wider perspective in the combinatorical context.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Gottfried. Jack L in his comment above provides links to bibliographies. $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2022 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, @LarryFreeman for notification. I'll be little available next 3 weeks but shall be back then. Btw. thumbs up for your meta-thread... $\endgroup$ Commented May 30, 2022 at 9:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .