The paper "Regular Functions on Certain Infinite-dimensional Groups" by Kac and Peterson describes the construction of a group associated to the datum of a Kac-Moody algebra in a way I haven't seen before. Let me outline the construction.
Let $A$ be a symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix. Define $\frak{g}$ by the usual, Serre-type relations. Denote by $\frak{g}'$ the derived algebra of $\frak{g}$. Let $F$ denote a field of characteristic 0.
The following is a quote from the above-mentioned paper, section 1C.
Let $G^*$ be the free product of the additive groups $\frak{g}_\alpha$, $\alpha \in \Delta^{\mathrm{re}}$ [the real roots], with canonical inclusions $i_\alpha: \frak{g}_\alpha$$ \to G^*$. For any integrable $\frak{g}'$-module $(V, \pi)$, define a homomorphism $\pi^*: G^* \to \operatorname{Aut}_F(V)$ by $\pi^*(i_\alpha(e)) = \operatorname{exp} \pi(e)$. Let $N^*$ be the intersection of all $\operatorname{Ker}\pi^*$, put $G = G^* / N^*$[...].
There are two examples given below the definition:
a) Let $A$ be the Cartan matrix of a split simple finite-dimensional Lie algebra $\frak{g}$ over $F$. Then the group $G$ associated to $\frak{g} := \frak{g}'$$(A)$ is the group $\underline{G}(F)$ of $F$-valued points of the connected simple-connected algebraic group $\underline{G}$ associated to $\frak{g}$ [...]
b) Let $\frak{g}$ be as in a), and let $\tilde{A}$ denote the extended Cartan matrix of $\frak{g}$. Then the group $G$ associated to $\frak{g}'$$(\tilde{A})$ is a central extension by $F^*$ of $\underline{G}(F[z, z^{-1}])$ [...]
I have managed to verify a) over the complex numbers for certain classical groups using basic Lie theory, though ideally I would like to see a proof using purely algebraic methods. I have no clue how to tackle the second one. I am thankful for references hinting to any of the following:
- Example calculations using this definition
- Other papers which make use of this definition (I am aware of the predecessor paper "Infinite flag varieties and conjugacy theorems" by the same authors.)
as well as for any advice on how to retrace the examples, especially in cases where one cannot read "integrable" as "comes from a representation of $G$".