6
$\begingroup$

Let $M$ be a compact orientable $n$ dimensional manifold. Assume that $M$ has trivial cobordism class.
Is there an embedding of $M$ in some Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^m$ such that the convex hull of $M$ is a $n+1$ dimensional manifold whose boundary is $M$?

Here the image of $M$ under the embedding is denoted again by $M$.

Note: One can pose the same question in the following geometric manner:

Let $M$ be a compact Riemannian manifold with trivial cobordism class. Is there an isometric embedding of $M$ in some Euclidean space such that the convex hull of $M$ is a manifold whose boundary is $M$?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Generally no. For example, plenty of homotopy spheres do not bound contractible manifolds. Many (?most?) homology 3-spheres do not bound contractible 4-manifolds, yet all 3-manifolds are null cobordant. $\endgroup$ May 14 at 7:09
  • $\begingroup$ @RyanBudney Snap! $\endgroup$ May 14 at 7:12
  • $\begingroup$ @RyanBudney I think Freedman proved that every homology 3-sphere bounds a contractible topological 4-manifold. $\endgroup$
    – Zerox
    May 14 at 11:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Zerox, I doubt it, but if you can find such a claim somewhere, you will have found a contradiction. For example, the Poincare Dodecahedral Space does not bound a contractible 4-manifold, due to the Rochlin invariant. $\endgroup$ 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ @RyanBudney I think you missed the word topological in Zerox's comment. On the other hand, the original question is a bit ambiguous about the category one is working in. The first part could be in the smooth/PL/topological category, and might have different answers. The second part presumably refers to smooth manifolds (because of the Riemannian metric). $\endgroup$ 2 days ago

2 Answers 2

12
$\begingroup$

Implicit in the other responses is the fact that if $M$ bounds a convex manifold $W$, then $W$ is contractible and so M has the homology of a sphere. So any null-cobordant manifold that is not a homology sphere is a counterexample. Eg take $M = X \# -X$ where $X$ is any orientable manifold with non-trivial homology.

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

There are exotic spheres (which are null cobordant) which do not bound a parallelisable manifold. Since the convex hull is contractible, it would be parallelisable if it were a manifold, so these guys do not admit embeddings like you want.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.