3
$\begingroup$

Alexander's Theorem guarantees that every oriented link is the closure of some braid. In other words, the map

$$ \displaystyle \coprod\_n \mathcal B_n\longrightarrow \{\text{ oriented links }\} $$

is surjective. One algorithm (I'm actually not sure that it's Alexander's original demonstration) involves choosing a basepoint in the complement of a diagram for the link and applying Reidemeister moves until the resulting diagram winds around the point in a consistent direction, at which point the diagram is manifestly the closure of a link.

If we begin with a positive diagram for a link, then do we necessarily obtain a positive braid?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think any of the algorithms obviously preserve positivity. Vogel's algorithm (which I think is what you're referring to) does a lot of Reidemeister II's, which always destroys positivity. I think if there's any pair of incoherently oriented Seifert circles, Vogel's algorithm will give a non-positive result. That said, I don't know of an obvious counter-example. $\endgroup$ – Ben Webster Oct 15 '10 at 3:03
  • $\begingroup$ There are positive knots which are not fibered, whereas positive braids are fibered. So one couldn't possibly put a positive non-fibered knot into positive braid position. $\endgroup$ – Ian Agol Aug 29 '17 at 3:52
5
$\begingroup$

Rudolph proved that positive links are strongly quasipositive. This paper might also be relevant, which allows one to create a braid with the same number of Seifert circles and writhe. However, Yamada's algorithm doesn't seem to preserve positivity either.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.