0
$\begingroup$

Let $... \leftarrow G_i \leftarrow G_{i+1} \leftarrow ...$ be an inverse system of graphs (which might not be locally finite), morphisms are symplicial maps (we allow collapsing of edges to vertices).

We define a combinatorial inverse limit as follows:

  • vertices are sequences ${x_i}$ such that each $x_i$ is a vertex for $G_i$,
  • vertices ${x_i}$ and ${y_i}$ are connected iff for every $i$ we have: $x_i$ and $y_i$ are equal or are connected in $G_i$.

As a set, a combinatorial inverse limit is same as the standard inverse limit of topological spaces, but the topology is different. In particular, a combinatorial inverse limit of connected graphs might be disconnected.

This construction seems very natural and I wonder if there is anything known about that?

I want to study how Gromov's hyperbolicity behaves when one passes to the inverse limit. The main example is the inverse limit of graphs of homotopy classes of curves on a surface.

Thus far someone told me about book by Luis Ribes but its main focus is about profinite properties of such limit. (question was also asked on Math.SE about a month ago, though the only answer was one listed above)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Here are a couple of references that may be relevant to you. A pro-$p$ curve complex was defined by Wilkes in this paper: arxiv.org/abs/1711.02953 . Pro-congruence curve and pants complexes were studied by Boggi: arxiv.org/abs/2004.04135 . $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Commented May 6, 2022 at 12:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ribes and Zalesski have studied profinite groups acting on profinite graphs and defined profinite trees homologically. $\endgroup$ Commented May 7, 2022 at 12:50

0

You must log in to answer this question.